Observer variability in the Goseki grouping of gastric adenocarcinoma in resection and biopsy specimens

Histopathology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 472-475

  McLaren, K M ^a   Burnett, R A ^b   Goodlad, J R ^c   Howatson, S R ^d   Lang, S ^e   Lee, F D ^f   Lessells, A M ^g   Ogston, S A ^e   Robertson, A J ^e   Simpson, J G ^h   Smith, G D ^e   Tavadia, H B ⁱ   Walker, F ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b WESTERN INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c RAIGMORE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d MONKLANDS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^f GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^g WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ Stirling Royal Infirmary   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

statistics; Gastric adenocarcinoma; Goseki; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ALCIAN BLUE; EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN; MUCIN;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; GASTRECTOMY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIODIC ACID SCHIFF STAIN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOMACH BIOPSY; STOMACH CARCINOMA; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BIOPSY; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0037517000     PISSN: 03090167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01609.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Goseki N, Takizawa T, Koike M. Differences in the mode of the extension of gastric cancer classified by histological type: new histological classification of gastric carcinoma. Gut 1992: 33; 606-612.
2. Dixon MF, Martin IG, Sue-Ling HM et al. Goseki grading in gastric cancer: comparison with existing systems of grading and its reproducibility. Histopathology 1994: 25; 309-316.
3. Songun I, van de Velde CJH, Arends JW et al. Classification of gastric carcinoma using the Goseki system provides prognostic information additional to TNM staging. Cancer 1999: 85; 2114-2118.
4. Roy P, Piard F, Dusserre-Guion L et al. Prognostic comparison of the pathological classifications of gastric cancer: a population-based study. Histopathology 1998: 33; 304-310.
5. Robertson AJ, Anderson JM, Beck JS et al. Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. J. Clin. Pathol. 1989: 42; 231-238.
6. McLaren KM, Burnett RA, Goodlad JR et al. Consistency of histopathological reporting of laryngeal dysplasia. Histopathology 2000: 37; 460-463.
7. Burnett RA, Beck JS, Howatson SR et al. Observer variability in the histopathological reporting of malignant bronchial biopsy specimens. J. Clin. Pathol. 1994: 47; 711-713.
8. Martin IG, Dixon MF, Sue-Ling HM et al. Goseki histological grading of gastric cancer is an important predictor of outcome. Gut 1994: 35; 758-763.