Investigations into the potential effects of pedoturbation on luminescence dating

Quaternary Science Reviews

Volumn 22, Issue 10-13, 2003, Pages 1169-1176

  Bateman, Mark D ^a   Frederick, Charles D ^a   Jaiswal, Manoj K ^b   Singhvi, Ashok K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LUMINESCENCE; NATURAL RESOURCES; SEDIMENTS;

LUMINESCENCE DATES;

GEOCHRONOLOGY;

BIOTURBATION; BLEACHING; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; DATING METHOD; GEOCHRONOLOGY; LUMINESCENCE DATING; SOIL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037507424     PISSN: 02773791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00019-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Butler, D.R., 1995. Zoogeomorphology: Animals as Geomorphic Agents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 231pp.
2. Folk, R.L., Ward, W.C., 1957. Brazos river bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters. Journal of Sediment Petrology 27, 514-529.
3. Fuchs, M., Lang, A., 2001. OSL dating of coarse-grained fluvial quartz using single-aliquot protocols on sediments from NE peloponnese, Greece. Quaternary Science Reviews 20, 783-787.
4. Gale, S.J., Hoare, P.G., 1991. Quaternary Sediments. Belhaven Press, London, 323pp.
5. Heimsath, A.M., Chappell, J., Spooner, N.A., Questiaux, D.G., 2002. Creeping soil. Geology 30, 111-114.
6. Johnson, D.L., Watson-Stegner, D., 1990. The soil-evolution model as a framework for evaluating pedoturbation in archaeological site formation. In: Lasca, N.P., Donahue, J. (Eds.), Archaeological Geology of North America, Centennial Special Volume 4, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 541-560.
7. Johnson, D.L., Watson-Stegner, D., Johnson, D.N., Schaetzl, R.J., 1987. Proisotropic and proanisotropic processes of pedoturbation. Soil Science 143 (4), 278-292.
8. Krumbein, W.C., 1934. Size frequency distributions of sediments. Journal of sedimentary Petrology 4, 65-77.
9. Leigh, D.S., 2001. Buried artefacts in sandy soils: techniques for evaluating pedoturbation versus sedimentation. In: Goldberg, P., Holliday, V., Reid Ferring, C. (Eds.), Earth Sciences and Archaeology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
10. Murray, A.S., Wintle, A.G., 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32, 57-73.
11. Olley, J.M., Caitcheon, G.G., Roberts, R.G., 1999. The origin of dose distributions in fluvial sediments, and the prospect of dating single grains from fluvial deposits using optically stimulated luminescence. Radiation Measurements 30, 207-217.
12. Ricklis, R.A., 2001. Archaeological, geoarchaeological, and paleoenvironmental assessment of an upland sandy mantle site. National register eligibility testing at 41LE177, Alcoa Sandow Mine, Lee County, Texas. Coastal Archaeological Research Inc.
13. Thorn, C.E., 1978. A preliminary assessment of the geomorphic role of pocket gophers in the alpine zone of the colorado front range. Geografiska Annaler 60A, 181-187.
14. Wood, W.R., Johnson, D.L., 1978. A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 315-381.