Effects of cell loss on MPEG video: Analytical modeling and empirical validation

Proceedings - 2002 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, ICME 2002

Volumn 2, Issue , 2002, Pages 457-460

  Snyder, Christopher W ^a   Sarkar, Uttam K ^a   Sarkar, Dilip ^a  

^a Department of Computer Science and Center for Computational Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL LOSS; EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; MPEG VIDEO;

EID: 0037507073     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2002.1035640     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. K. Chandra and A. R. Reibman, Modeling one- and two-layer variable bit rate video, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 7 (1999), no. 3, 398 - 413.
2. MPEG Software Simulation Group, MPEG-2 encoder / decoder, version 1.2, July 19, 1996, http:// www. mpeg. org/ MSSG/.
3. D. P. Heyman, The GBAR source model for VBR videoconferences, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 5 (1997), no. 4, 554-560.
4. D. P. Heyman, A. Tabatabai, and T. V. Lakshman, Statistical analysis and simulation study of video teleconferencing traffic in ATM, IEEE Transactions on Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 2 (1992), 49-59.
5. The laboratory for applied biotelemetry and biotech-nology at Texas A and M university galveston website, http://www.tamug.tamu.edu/ labb/ Projects/OptFor/ Video-dips. htm.
6. V. D. B. Lambercht, Perceptual models and architectures for video coding applications, Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, 1996.
7. J.W. Roberts, J. Guibert, and A. Simonian, Network performance considerations in the design of a VBR codec, 1991, pp. 77-82.
8. Q. Ren and H. Kobayashi, Diffusion approximation modeling for markov modulated bursty traffic and its applications to bandwidth allocation in ATM networks, Journal on Selected Areas in Comm 16 (1998), no. 5, 679-691.
9. U. K. Sarkar, S. Ramakrishnan, and D. Sarkar, Modeling full-length video using markov-modulated gamma-based framework, Proceedings of IEEE Globecom 2001, Multimedia QoS/Video Applications, 2001, pp. 1 - 5.
10. C.W Snyder, U.K. Sarkar, and D. Sarkar, Study of ATM network cell loss on quality of MPEG video, Tech. Report CSC-Jan02-01, Department of Computer Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, 2002.
11. Tsunami MPEG encoder (TMPGEnc), http://www. tmpgenc. com/ ejnain. html.
12. O. Verscheure, P. Frossard, and M. Hamdi, User-oriented QoS analysis in MPEG-2 video delivery, Real Time Imaging 5 (1999), 305 - 314.
13. J.-L. Wu, Y.-W Chen, and K.-C. Jiang, Two models for variable bit rate MPEG sources, IEICE Trans. Com-mun. E78-B (1995), 737-745.
14. A. Webster, C. Jones, M. Pinson, S. Voran, and S. Wolf, An objective video quality assessment system based on human perception, SPIE - Human Vision, Visual Processing and Digital Display, vol. 1913, 1993, pp. 15-26.