Herbivores do not discriminate between leaves of female and hermaphrodite individuals of gynodioecious Daphne laureola (Thymelaeaceae)

Oikos

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 505-510

  Alonso, Conchita ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENDER; GYNODIOECY; HERBIVORE; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

ANIMALIA; DAPHNE; DAPHNE LAUREOLA; LAUREOLA; THYMELAEACEAE;

EID: 0037504407     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12115.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agrawal, A. A., Strauss, S. Y. and Stout, M. J. 1999. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. - Evolution 53: 1093-1104.
2. Ågren, J., Danell, K., Elmqvist, T. et al. 1999. Sexual dimorphism and biotic interactions. - In: Geber, M. A., Dawson, T. E. and Delph, L. F. (eds), Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, pp. 217-246.
3. Alonso, C. and Herrera, C. M. 1996. Variation in herbivory within and among plants of Daphne laureola (Thymelaeaceae): correlation with plant size and architecture. - J. Ecol. 84: 495-502.
4. Alonso, C. and Herrera, C. M. 2000. Seasonal variation in leaf characteristics and food selection by larval noctuids on an evergreen Mediterranean shrub. - Acta Oecol. 21: 257-265.
5. Alonso, C. and Herrera, C. M. 2001. Neither vegetative nor reproductive advantages account for high frequency of male-steriles in southern Spanish gynodioecious Daphne laureola (Thymelaeaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 88: 1016-1024.
6. Ashman, T.-L. 1999. Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. - J. Evol. Biol. 12: 648-661.
7. Ashman, T.-L. 2002. The role of herbivores in the evolution of separate sexes from hermaphroditism. - Ecology 83: 1175-1184.
8. Bernays, E. A. and Weiss, M. R. 1996. Induced food preferences in caterpillars: the need to identify mechanisms. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 78: 1-8.
9. Boecklen, W. J., Price, P. W. and Mopper, S. 1990. Sex and drugs and herbivores: sex-biased herbivory in arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis). - Ecology 71: 581-588.
10. Campbell, D. R. 2000. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. - TREE 15: 227-232.
11. Collin, C. L., Pennings, P. S., Rueffler, C. et al. 2002. Natural enemies and sex: how seed predators and pathogens contribute to sex-differential reproductive success in a gynodioecious plant. - Oecologia 131: 94-102.
12. Delph, L. F. 1990. Sex-differential resource allocation patterns in the subdioecious shrub Hebe subalpina. - Ecology 71: 1342-1351.
13. Delph, L. F. 1993. Factors affecting intraplant variation in flowering and fruiting in the gynodioecious species Hebe subalpina. - J. Ecol. 81: 287-296.
14. Eckhart, V. M. and Seger, J. 1999. Phenological and developmental costs of male function in hermaphroditic plants. - In: Vuorisalo, T. O. and Mutikainen, P. K. (eds), Life history evolution in plants. Kluwer, pp. 195-213.
15. Egas, M. and Sabelis, M. W. 2001. Adaptive learning of host preference in a herbivorous arthropod. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 190-195.
16. Hatcher, L. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® System for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. - SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC.
17. Jallow, M. F. A. and Zalucki, M. P. 1995. A technique for measuring intraspecific variation in oviposition preference in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). - J. Aust. Ent. Soc. 34: 281-288.
18. Jing, S. W. and Coley, P. D. 1990. Dioecy and herbivory: the effect of growth rate on plant defense in Acer negundo. - Oikos 58: 369-377.
19. Kause A., Haukioja E. and Hanhimäki, S. 1999. Phenotypic plasticity in foraging behavior of sawfly larvae. - Ecology 80: 1230-1241.
20. Karowe, D. N. 1989. Facultative monophagy as a consequence of prior feeding experience: behavioral and physiological specialization in Colias philodice larvae. - Oecologia 78: 106-111.
21. Marshall, M. and Ganders, F. R. 2001. Sex-biased seed predation and the maintenance of females in a gynodioecious plant. - Am. J. Bot. 88: 1437-1443.
22. Mutikainen, P. and Delph, L. F. 1996. Effects of herbivory on male reproductive success in plants. - Oikos 75: 353-358.
23. Niemelä, P., Hanhimäki, S. and Mannila, R. 1981. The relationship of adult size in noctuid moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) to breadth form of host plants. - Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 47: 17-20.
24. Nieto Feliner, G. 1997. Thymelaeaceae. - In: Castroviejo, S., Aedo, C., Benedi, C. et al. (eds), Flora Iberica, vol. VIII, Haloragaceae-Euphorbiaceae. Real Jardin Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain, pp. 32-69.
25. Roulston, T. H. and Cane, J. H. 2000. Pollen nutritional content and digestibility for animals. - Plant Syst. Evol. 222: 187-209.
26. SAS Institute 1996. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through Release 6.11. - SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
27. Singer, M. S. 2001. Determinants of polyphagy by a woolly bear caterpillar: a test of the physiological efficiency hypothesis. - Oikos 93: 194-204.
28. Uno, G. E. 1982. Comparative reproductive biology of hermaphroditic and male-sterile Iris douglasiana Herb. (Iridaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 69: 818-823.
29. Webb, C. J. 1999. Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems. - In: Geber, M. A., Dawson, T. E. and Delph, L. F. (eds), Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, pp. 61-95.