Notation systems for transcription: An empirical investigation

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 619-631

  Romero, Catherine ^a   O'Connell, Daniel C ^a   Kowal, Sabine ^b  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Notation systems; Transcription

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMITATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; LINGUISTICS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0037504206     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021217105211     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Deese, J. (1984). Thought into language: The psychology of a language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Ehlich, K. (1993). HIAT: A transcription system for discourse data. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (123-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Ferber, R. (1991). Slip of the tongue or slip of the ear? On the perception and transcription of naturalistic slips of the tongue. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 105-122.
5. Fine, E. C. (1984). The folklore text: From performance to print. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6. Gumperz, J. J., & Berenz, N. (1993). Transcribing conversational exchange. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription anil coding in discourse research (91-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Gutfleisch-Rieck, J., Klein, W., Speck, A., & Spranz-Fogasy, T. (1989). Transkriptions-vereinbarungen für den Sonderforschungsbereich 245 "Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext. " Heidelberg, Germany: Universitäten Heidelberg/Mannheim.
8. Heinze, H. (1979). Gesprochenes und geschriebenes Deutsch: Vergleichende Untersuchungen von Bundestagsreden und deren schriftlich aufgezeichneter Version. Düsseldorf, Germany: Schwann.
9. Lindsay, J., & O'Connell, D. C. (1995). How do transcribers deal with audio recordings of spoken discourse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 101-115.
10. MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (43-72). New York: Academic Press.
12. O'Connell, D. C. (1991). The spoken flies away; the written stays put. Georgetown Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 2, 274-283.
13. O'Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (1990a). A note on time, timing, and transcriptions thereof. Georgetown Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 1, 203-208.
14. O'Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (1990b). Some sources of error in the transcription of real time in spoken discourse. Georgetown Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 1, 453-466.
15. O'Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (1994a). Some current transcription systems for spoken discourse: A critical analysis. Pragmatics, 4, 81-107.
16. O'Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (1994b). The transcriber as language user. In G. Bartelt (Ed.), The dynamics of language processes: Essays in honor of Hans W. Dechert (119-142). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
17. O'Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (1999). Transcription and the issue of standardization. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 103-120.
18. O'Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (2000). Are transcripts reproducible? Pragmatics, 10, 247-269.
19. O'Connell, D. C., Kowal, S., Bartels, U., Mundt, H., & Van De Water, D. (1989). Allocation of time in reading aloud: Being fluent is nor the same as being rhetorical. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 223-226.
20. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barden, B., Bergmann, J., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Günthner, S., Meier, C., Quasthoff, U., Schlobinski, P., & Uhmann, S. (1998). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte, 173, 91-122.
21. Svartvik, J. (Ed.). (1990). The London-Lund corpus of spoken English: Description and research. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
22. Svartvik, J., & Quirk, R. (Eds.). (1980). A corpus of English conversation. Lund, Sweden: CWK Gleerup.
23. Walker, A. G. (1986). The verbatim record: The myth and the reality. In S. Fisher & D. Todd (Eds.), Discourse and institutional authority: Medicine, education, and law (205-222). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.