Sensitivity coefficients for three-phase flow history matching

Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 70-76

  Li, R ^b   Reynolds, A C ^b   Oliver, D S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREHOLES; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; MULTIPHASE FLOW; NUMERICAL METHODS; POROSITY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; SEPARATION;

ADJOINT SYSTEM OF EQUATION; GAS OIL RATIO; GRIDBLOCK PERMEABILITY; RESERVOIR SIMULATOR; SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENTS; THREE PHASE FLOW; WATER OIL RATIO; WELLBORE PRESSURE;

PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS;

EID: 0037503153     PISSN: 00219487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2118/03-04-04     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Chen, W.H., Gavalas, G.R., Seinfeld, J.H., and Wasserman, M.L., A New Alogorithm for Automatic History Matching; Society Petroleum Engineering Journal, pp. 593-608, 1974.
2. Chavent, G.M., Dupuy, M., and Lemonnier, P., History Matching by Use of Optimal Control Theory; Society Petroleum Engineering Journal, 15 (1), pp. 74-86, 1975.
3. Wasserman, M.L., Emanuel, A.S., and Seinfeld, J.H., Practical Applications of Optimal-Control Theory to History-Matching Multiphase Simulator Models; Society Petroleum Engineering Journal, 15 (4), pp. 347-355, 1975.
4. Lee, T.Y. and Seinfeld, J.H., Estimation of Two-Phase Petroleum Reservoir Properties by Regularization; Journal of Computational Physics, 69, pp. 397-419, 1987.
5. Yang, P-H. and Watson, A.T., Automatic History Matching with Variable-Metric Methods; SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(3), pp. 995-1001, 1988.
6. Makhlouf, E.M., Chen, W.H., Wasserman, M.L., and Seinfeld, J.H., A General History Matching Algorithm for Three-Phase, Three-Dimensional Petroleum Reservoirs; SPE Advanced Technology Series, 1 (2), pp. 83-91, 1993.
7. Wu, Z., Reynolds, A.C., and Oliver, D.S., Conditioning Geostatistical Models to Two-Phase Production Data; Society Petroleum Engineering Journal, 3 (2), pp. 142-155, 1999.
8. Yeh, W.W.-G., Review of Parameter Identification in Groundwater Hydrology: The Inverse Problem; Water Resource Res., 22(2), pp. 95-108, 1986.
9. Anterion, F., Karcher, B., and Eymard, R., Use of Parameter Gradients for Reservoir History Matching; paper SPE 18433, 10th SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, pp. 339-354, 1989.
10. Tan, T.B. and Kalogerakis, N., A Fully Implicit, Three-Dimensional, Three-Phase Simulator With Automatic History-Matching Capability; paper SPE 21205, Proceedings of the 11th SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Anaheim, CA, pp. 35-46, February 1991.
11. Tan, T.B., A Computationally Efficient Gauss-Newton Method for Automatic History Matching; paper SPE 29100, Proceedings of the 13th SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, pp. 61-70, 1995.
12. Bissell, R., Sharma, Y., and Killough, J.E., History Matching Using the Method of Gradients: Two Case Studies; paper SPE 28590, SPE 69th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp. 275-289, 1994.
13. Landa, J.L. and Horne, R.N., A Procedure to Integrate Well Test Data, Reservoir Performance History and 4D Seismic Information Into a Reservoir Description; paper SPE-38653, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1997.
14. Li, R., Reynolds, A.C., and Oliver, D.S., History Matching of Three-Phase Flow Production Data; paper SPE 66351, Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 2001.
15. Aziz, K. and Settari, A., Petroleum Reservoir Simulation; Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, 1979.