Identifying writing strategies through text analysis

Written Communication

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 51-75

  Van Wijk, Carel ^a   Sanders, T E D ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037502689     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088399016001003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bereiter, G, & ScardamaKa, M. (1983). Levels of inquiry in writing research. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 3-25). New York: Longman.
2. Bereiter, C, & Scardamalia, M. (1984). Information-processing demand of text composition. In H. Mandl, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 407-428). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bracewell, R., & Breuleux, A. (1994). Substance and romance in analyzing think-aloud protocols. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 55-88). London: Sage Ltd.
4. Cooper, G, & Matsuhashi, A. (1983). A theory of the writing process. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language (pp. 3-39). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
5. Cronbach, L., Rajara tnam, N., & Gleser, G. (1963). Theory of generalizability : A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16,137-163.
6. Frederiksen, C, Donin-Frederiksen, J., & Bracewell, R. (1987). Discourse analysis of children's text production. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modelling production processes (pp. 254-290). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Greene, S., & Higgins, L. (1994). "Once upon a time": The use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 115-140). London: Sage Ltd.
8. Mann, W., & Thompson, S. (1986). Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 9,57-90.
9. Mann, W., & Thompson, S. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8,243-281.
10. Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 15,113-134.
11. Paris, C, & McKeown, K. (1987). Discourse strategies for describing complex physical objects. In G. Kempen (Ed.), Natural language generation: New results in artificial intelligence, psychology, and linguistics (pp. 97-115). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
12. Sanders, T. (1992). Discourse structure and coherence: Aspects of a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
13. Sanders, T., Janssen, D., Van der Pool, E., Schilperoord, J., & Van Wijk, C. (19%). Hierarchical text structure in written products and writing processes. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models, and methodology in writing research (pp. 473-492). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
14. Sanders, T., & Van Wijk, C. (1996a). PISA-A procedure for analyzing the structure of explanatory texts. Text, 16,91-132.
15. Sanders, T., & Van Wijk, C. (1996b). Text analysis as a research tool: How hierarchical text structure contributes to the understanding of conceptual processes in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 251-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Schilperoord, J. (19%). It's about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
17. Schilperoord, J., & Sanders, T. (1997). Pauses, cognitive rhythms, and discourse structure: An empirical study of discourse production. In A. Liebert, G. Redeker, & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 247-267). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
18. Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (19%). The dynamics of composing: Modeling writing process data. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 207-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse compreliension. New York Academic Press.
20. Van der Pool, E. (1995). Writing as a conceptual process: A text-analytical study of developmental aspects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
21. Van der Pool, E., & Van Wijk, C. (1995). Procès en stratégie in een psycholingu'istisch model van schrijven en lezen [Process and strategy in a psycholinguistic model of writing and reading]. Tijdschrifl voor Onderwijsresearch, 20,200-214.
22. Van Wijk, C. (1992). Information analysis in written discourse. In J. de Jong & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), The construct of language proficiency (pp. 85-99). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
23. Van Wijk, C. (1998). Conceptual processes in argumentation: A developmental perspective. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Cognitive perspectives on conceptual processes in text production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
24. Witte, S., & Cherry, R. (1986). Writing processes and written products in composition research. In C. Cooper &S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguisticapproaches (pp. 112-153). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Zwaan, R (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22,1196-1207.