Working situation model for safety integration during design phase

CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 119-122

  Bernard, A ^a   Hasan, R ^b  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN COMMUNICATIONS ET CYBERNÉTIQUE DE NANTES   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN AUTOMATIQUE DE NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

Design process; Experience feedback; Safety integration

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SIMULATION;

SAFETY INTEGRATION;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 0037501310     PISSN: 00078506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61480-2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Krause, F.-L., Kimura, F., Kjellberg, T., Lu, S.C.-Y., 1993, Product Modeling, Annals of the CIRP, 42/2: 695-706.
2. Brissaud, D., Tichkiewitch, S., 2001, Product models for life-cycle, Annals of the CIRP, 50/1:105-108.
3. th IFAC Symposium on Information Control in Manufacturing, Nancy, pp. 233-239.
4. Fadier, E., Ciccotelli, J., 1999, How to integrate safety in design: methods and models, Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, Vol. 9 (4), John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 367-380.
5. Pr EN 1010, 1997, European standard, definitive project. Safety requirements for the design and construction of printing and paper converting machines - Part 1: common requirements, European committee for standardization, Brussels.
6. Jouffroy, D., Demor, S., Ciccotelli, J., Martin, P., 1999. An approach to integrate safety at the design stage of numerically controlled woodworking machines, Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, Kluwer Academic publisher, pp. 643-650, ISBN 0-7923-6024-9.
7. Blaise J. C., Lhoste P., Ciccotelli J., 1999, Safety of machinery: integration of engineering, technical and normative views, European Safety and Reliability Conference, Schuëller & Kafka (eds), Rotterdam, pp. 1411-1416, ISBN 90-5809-109-0.
8. Choi B. K, Kim B. H., 2000, A human-centred virtual manufacturing system architecture for next generation manufacturing, CIRP Design Seminar, Haifa, Israel.
9. Wang, H., Hammoud, H., Johnson, D. and Bakkar, J., 1997, A methodology for early front end structural design to meet safety requirements using CAE tools, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 16-21, Dallas, AMD Vol.225/BED Vol.38: 1-15.
10. Garro, O., Salad, I., Martin, P., 1995, Distributed design theory and methodology, Concurrent engineering. Vol, 3, n°1, pp. 43-54.
11. Sohlenius G., 1992, Concurrent engineering, Annals of the CIRP, 41/2:645-655.
12. Harani Y., 1997, Generic model for the representation of design activity, XV INFORSID conference, Toulouse, France.
13. Hasan, R., Ciccotelli, J., Bernard, A., Martin, P., 2000. Representation and evaluation of risks during the design phase of a complex system, ESREL 2000, Foresight and Precaution, Cottam, Harvey, Pape & Tate (eds), Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 141-147, ISBN 90-5809-140-6.
14. EN 292-1, 1991, European standard, safety of machinery, basic concepts, general principles of design - part 1: basic terminology, methodology, European committee for standardization, Brussels.
15. EN 1050, 1997, European standard, safety of machinery - principles for risk assessment, European committee for standardization, Brussels.
16. EN 614-1, 1995, European standard, safety of machinery, Ergonomic design principles - Part 1: terminology and general principles, European committee for standardization, Brussels.
17. E 09-003, ENV 1070, 1993, European standard, safety of machinery, Terminology, European committee for standardization, Brussels.