Scuba diving with cochlear implants

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

Volumn 112, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 425-427

  Kompis, Martin ^a   Vibert, Dominique ^b   Senn, Pascal ^b   Vischer, Mattheus W ^b   Häusler, Rudolf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Bilateral cochlear implantation; Cochlear implant; Diving; Hyperbaric exposure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DIVING; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; HYPERBARISM; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0037500143     PISSN: 00034894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000348940311200507     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Allum JH, Greisiger R, Straubhaar S, Carpenter MG. Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol. Br J Audiol 2000; 34:293-303.
2. Hamzavi J, Franz P, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W. Hearing performance in noise of cochlear implant patients versus severely-profoundly hearing-impaired patients with hearing aids. Audiology 2001;40:26-31.
3. Kompis M, Vischer MW, Häusler R. Performance of compressed analogue (CA) and continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) coding strategies for cochlear implants in quiet and noise. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1999;119:659-64.
4. Helms J, Müller J, Schön F, et al. Comparison of the TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor and the CIS PRO+ body-worn processor in adult MED-EL cochlear implant users. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2001;63:31-40.
5. Kompis M, Jenk M, Vischer MW, Seifert E, Häusler R. Intra- and intersubject comparison of cochlear implant systems using the Esprit and the Tempo+ behind-the-ear speech processor. Int J Audiol 2002;41:555-62.
6. Backous DD, Dunford RG, Segel P, Muhlocker MC, Carter P, Hampson NB. Effects of hyperbaric exposure on the integrity of the internal components of commercially available cochlear implant systems. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:463-7.
7. Vibert D, Häusler R, Kompis M, Vischer M. Vestibular function in patients with cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 2001(suppl 545):29-34.
8. Müller J, Schön F, Helms J. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2002;23:198-206.
9. Kompis M, Senn P, Vischer M, Häusler R. Schalllokalisation und Sprachverständnis nach bilateraler Cochlea-Implantation. Z Audiol Suppl 2001 (suppl 4):44-6.
10. Senn P, Vischer M, Kompis M, Häusler R. Resultate nach bilateraler Cochlea-Implantation. Schweiz Med Forum Suppl 2002(suppl 6):73S-75S.
11. Fishman KE, Shannon RV, Slattery WH. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40:1201-15.
12. Brill SM, Gstöttner W, Helms J, et al. Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+. Am J Otol 1997; 18(suppl 6):S104-S106.