Beyond charitable choice: The diverse service delivery approaches of local faith-related organizations

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 207-230

  Campbell, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037499509     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/08964002031002003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ammerman, N. T. (1997), Congregation & community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. Anderson, S., Orr, J., & Silverman, C. (2001). Can we make welfare reform work?: The California Religious Community Capacity Study. Sacramento: California Council of Churches.
3. Berger, P., & Neuhaus, J. (1977). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute.
4. Berman, E. M. (1996). Local government and community based strategies: Evidence from a national survey of a social problem. American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 71-91.
5. Boyte, H. (1985). Community is possible. New York: Harper & Row.
6. Campbell, D. (1987). Church-state separation and competing political ideals: The promise of value-based community organizing. Christian Scholar's Review, 17(1), 25-35.
7. Campbell, D. (1997). Community welfare reform planning: Early indications from six California counties (Working Papers Series). Davis: University of California, California Communities Program.
8. Campbell, D. (1998). Welfare reform, workforce development, and the challenge of job creation (California Community Topics, No. 3). Davis: University of California, California Communities Program.
9. Campbell, D. (1999). Building the plane while flying it: Welfare reform and emerging patterns of community governance (California Community Topics, No. 4). Davis: University of California, California Communities Program.
10. Campbell, D. (2000). Welfare reform shines a light on workforce development challenges. California Agriculture, 54(1), 35-40.
11. Carlson-Thies, S. W., & Skillen, J. W. (1996). Welfare in America; Christian perspectives. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
12. Castelli, J. (1997). Faith-related social services: A blessing, not a miracle (Policy Report No. 27). Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
13. Center for Public Justice. (1997). A guide to charitable choice. Available from Center for Public Justice Web site, http://www.cpjustice.org
14. Chaves, M. (1999). Religious congregations and welfare reform: Who will take advantage of "charitable choice?" American Sociological Review, 64, 836-846.
15. Cnaan, R. A. (1997). Social and community involvement of religious congregations housed in historic religious properties: Findings from a six-city study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania School of Social Work, Program for the Study of Organized Religion and Social Work.
16. Cnaan, R. A. (with Wineburg, R. J., & Boddie, S. C.). (1999). The newer deal: Social work and religion in partnership. New York: Columbia University Press.
17. Davis, D. H. (1996). The church-state implications of the new welfare reform law. Journal of Church and State, 38(4), 719-731.
18. Glenn, C. L. (2000). The ambiguous embrace: Government and faith-based schools and social agencies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Graf, A. (1980). Integrating the discussion of values into the organizing process. San Francisco: Organize Training Center.
20. Hall, P. D. (1992). Inventing the nonprofit sector. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Harris, M. (1995). Quiet care: Welfare work and religious congregations. Journal of Social Policy, 24(1), 53-71.
22. Hodgkinson, V. A., Weitzman, M., & Kirsh, A. (1988). From belief to commitment: The activities and finances of religious congregations in the United States: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
23. Jeavons, T. H. (1998). Identifying characteristics of "religious" organizations: An exploratory proposal. In N. J. Demerath, P. D. Hall, T. Schmitt, & R. H. Williams, Sacred companies: Organizational aspects of religion and religious aspects of organizations (pp. 79-95). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Lemp, C., Campbell, D., & Wright, J. (1999). Nonprofit involvement in welfare reform: Fresno County and Proteus, Inc. Davis: University of California, California Communities Program.
25. Miller, M. (1978). The ideology of the community organizing movement. San Francisco: Organize Training Center.
26. Netting, F. E. (1982). Secular and religious funding of church-related agencies. Social Service Review, 56, 586-604.
27. Orr, J. (2001). Religion-based employment discrimination in charitable choice: A guide for the perplexed. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Center for Religion and Civic Culture.
28. Pierce, G. (1984). Activism that makes sense. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist.
29. Printz, T. J. (1998). Faith-related service providers in the nation's capital: Can they do more? (No. 2 in Charting Civil Society, a series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
30. Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Sherman, A. L. (1995, Fall). Cross purposes: Will conservative welfare reform corrupt religious charities? Policy Review, 74, 58-63.
32. Sherman, A. L. (2000a). The growing impact of charitable choice: A catalogue of new collaborations between government and faith-based organizations in nine states. Washington, DC: Center for Publlic Justice.
33. Sherman, A. L. (2000b, July 5-12). Churches as government partners: Navigating "charitable choice." The Christian Century, pp. 716-721.
34. Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Smith, S. R., & Sosin, M. R. (2001). The varieties of faith-related agencies. Public Administration Review, 61, 651-670.
36. Wineburg, R. J. (1993, Spring). Social policy, community service development, and religious organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 3(3), 283-297.
37. Wineburg, R. J. (1994, Summer). A longitudinal case study of religious congregations in local human services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(2), 159-169.
38. Wolch, J. R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.
39. Wolfe, A. (1989). Whose keeper? Social science and moral obligation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40. Wood, R. L. (1994). Faith in action: Religious resources for political success in three congregations. Sociology of Religion, 55(4), 397-417.