|
Volumn 59, Issue , 1996, Pages 222-229
|
Hecht v. Superior Court (Kane)
[No Author Info available]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT CHILD;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION;
BEHAVIOR;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
DEATH;
DONOR;
FAMILY;
FAMILY SIZE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HEALTH CARE FACILITY;
HECHT V. SUPERIOR COURT (KANE);
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LIVING WILL;
MOTIVATION;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION;
REPRODUCTION;
SPERMATOZOON;
SUICIDE;
UNITED STATES;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HECHT V. SUPERIOR COURT (KANE);
LEGAL APPROACH;
ADULT CHILDREN;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
CALIFORNIA;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
DEATH;
FAMILY;
HUMANS;
INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL;
INTENTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MOTIVATION;
OWNERSHIP;
POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION;
REPRODUCTION;
SINGLE PERSON;
SPERMATOZOA;
SUICIDE;
TISSUE BANKS;
TISSUE DONORS;
|
EID: 0037475680
PISSN: 87502623
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|