Immunohistochemical assessment of mesotelencephalic dopamine activity during the acquisition and expression of Pavlovian versus instrumental behaviours

Neuroscience

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 755-767

  Phillips, G D ^a   Setzu, E ^a   Vugler, A ^a,b   Hitchcott, P K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accumbens; Amygdala; Antibody; Cortex; Learning

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; DOPAMINE; GLUTARALDEHYDE; SUCROSE;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOREACTIVITY; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STRIATE CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037475150     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00799-6     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arluison M., Javoy-Agid F., Feuerstein C., Tauc M., Conrath-Verrier M., Mailly P. Histofluorescence analysis of several systems of catecholaminergic nerve fibres within the rat neostriatum revealed by either restricted lesions of the substantia nigra or gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Brain Res Bull. 9:1982;355-365.
2. Arts M.P., Groenewegen H.J., Veening J.G., Cools A.R. Efferent projections of the retrorubral nucleus to the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in cats as shown by anterograde tracing. Brain Res Bull. 40:1996;219-228.
3. Balleine B.W., Dickinson A. Goal-directed instrumental action contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates . Neuropharmacology. 37:1998;407-419.
4. Beckstead R.M., Domesick V.B., Nauta W.J. Efferent connections of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in the rat. Brain Res. 175:1979;191-217.
5. Beninger R.J., Hanson D.R., Phillips A.G. The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement effects of cocaine, (+)-amphetamine and pipradrol . Br J Pharmacol. 74:1981;149-154.
6. Bungay P.M., Morrison P.F., Dedrick R.L. Steady-state theory for quantitative microdialysis of solutes and water in vivo and in vitro. Life Sci. 46:1990;105-119.
7. Cador M., Robbins R.W., Everitt B.J., Simon H., Le Moal M., Stinus L. Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes modulation by the dopaminergic system . Willner P., Scheel-Krüger J. The mesolimbic dopamine system from motivation to action . 1991;225-250 John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. Cassell M.D., Gray T.S., Kiss J.Z. Neuronal architecture in the rat central nucleus of the amygdala a cytological, hodological, and immunocytochemical study . J Comp Neurol. 246:1986;478-499.
9. Colwill R.M., Motzkin D.K. Encoding of the unconditioned stimulus in Pavlovian conditioning. Ann Learn Behav. 22:1994;384-394.
10. Colwill R.M., Rescorla R.A. Instrumental responding remains sensitive to reinforcer devaluation after extensive training. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc. 11:1985;520-536.
11. Colwill R.M., Rescorla R.A. The role of response-reinforcer associations increases throughout extended instrumental training. Ann Learn Behav. 16:1988;105-111.
12. Davis W.M., Smith S.G. Role of conditioned reinforcers in the initiation, maintenance and extinction of drug-seeking behavior. Pavlovian J Biol Sci. 11:1976;222-236.
13. Freedman L.J., Cassell M.D. Distribution of dopaminergic fibers in the central division of the extended amygdala of the rat. Brain Res. 633:1994;243-252.
14. Harmer C.J., Phillips G.D. Enhanced dopamine efflux in the amygdala by a predictive, but not a non-predictive, stimulus facilitation by prior repeated d-amphetamine . Neuroscience. 90:1999;119-130.
15. Hitchcott P.K., Bonardi C.M.T., Phillips G.D. Enhanced stimulus-reward learning by intra-amygdala administration of a D-3 dopamine receptor agonist. Psychopharmacology. 133:1997;240-248.
16. Hitchcott P.K., Harmer C.J., Phillips G.D. Enhanced acquisition of discriminative approach following intra-amygdala d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology. 132:1997;237-246.
17. Hitchcott P.K., Phillips G.D. Double dissociation of the behavioural effects of R(+) 7-OH-DPAT infusions in the central and basolateral amygdala nuclei upon Pavlovian and instrumental conditioned appetitive behaviours. Psychopharmacology. 140:1998;458-469.
18. Hitchcott P.K., Phillips G.D. Effects of intra amygdala R(+) 7-OH-DPAT on intraaccumbens d-amphetamine-associated learning. I. Pavlovian conditioning. Psychopharmacology. 140:1998;300-309.
19. Holland P. Amount of training affects associatively-activated event representation. Neuropharmacology. 37:1998;461-469.
20. Holland P.C., Straub J.J. Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc. 5:1979;65-78.
21. Hull C.L. A behavior system. 1952;Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
22. Ikemoto S., Panksepp J. The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking . Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 31:1999;6-41.
23. Iwano H., Yamamuro Y., Hori K., Yamauchi T., Nomura M. Effects of discrimination learning on the rat striatal dopaminergic activity a microdialysis study . Neuroreport. 8:1997;1095-1098.
24. Mackintosh N.J. The psychology of animal learning. 1974;Academic Press, London.
25. McRae-Degueurce A., Geffard M. One perfusion mixture for immunocytochemical detection of noradrenaline, dopamine, serotonin and acetylcholine in the same rat brain. Brain Res. 376:1986;217-219.
26. Morutto S.L., Phillips G.D. Post-session intra-perifornical region quinpirole infusions retard the consolidation of an appetitive differential conditioning task. Behav Pharmacol. 10:1999;113-118.
27. Oades R.D., Halliday G.M. Ventral tegmental (A10) system neurobiology. I. Anatomy and connectivity . Brain Res. 434:1987;117-165.
28. Paxinos G., Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 1986;Academic Press, Sydney.
29. Phillips G.D., Hitchcott P.K. Blockade of the acquisition, but not expression of associative learning by pre-session intra-amygdala R(+) 7-OH-DPAT. Psychopharmacology. 2003.
30. Phillips G.D., Morutto S.L. Post-session sulpiride infusions within the perifornical region of the lateral hypothalamus enhance consolidation of associative learning. Psychopharmacology. 140:1998;354-364.
31. Phillips G.D., Setzu E., Hitchcott P.K. Post-session d-amphetamine within the shell, but not core of the nucleus accumbens facilitates the acquisition of a Pavlovian conditioned approach response. Behav Neurosci. 2003.
32. Phillips G.D., Setzu E., Vugler A., Hitchcott P.K. An immunohistochemical examination of the effects of sensitisation on mesotelencephalic dopaminergic response to d-amphetamine. Neuroscience. 117:2003;741-753.
33. Rescorla R.A. Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc. 20:1994;44-50.
34. Rescorla R.A., Solomon R.L. Two-process learning theory relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning . Psychol Rev. 74:1967;151-182.
35. Rescorla R.A., Wagner A.R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement . Black A.H., Prokasy W.F. Classical conditioning. 1972;64-99 Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
36. Robbins T.W. The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine and nomifensine . Psychopharmacology. 58:1978;79-87.
37. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction . Brain Res Rev. 18:1993;247-291.
38. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The psychology and neurobiology of addiction an incentive-sensitization view . Addiction. 95:(suppl 2):2000;S91-117.
39. Robinson T.E., Camp D.M. Does amphetamine preferentially increase the extracellular concentration of dopamine in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats? Neuropsychopharmacology. 3:1990;163-173.
40. Schultz W. Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. J Neurophysiol. 80:1998;1-27.
41. Spanagel R., Weiss F. The dopamine hypothesis of reward past and current status . Trends Neurosci. 22:1999;521-527.
42. Tolman E.C. Purposive behavior in animals and men. 1932;The Century Co, New York.
43. Trapold M.A., Overmier J.B. The second learning process in instrumental learning. Black A.A., Prokasy W.F. Classical conditioning 2. current research and theory . 1972;427-452 Appleton-Century Crofts, New York.
44. Voorn P., Jorritsma Byham B., Van Dijk C., Buijs R.M. The dopaminergic innervation of the ventral striatum in the rat a light- and electron-microscopical study with antibodies against dopamine . J Comp Neurol. 251:1986;84-99.
45. Westerink B.H.C., Justice J.B. Jr. Microdialysis compared with other in vivo release models. Robinson T.E., Justice J.B. Jr. Microdialysis in the neurosciences. 1991;23-43 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
46. Wilkinson L.S., Humby T., Killcross A.S., Torres E.M., Everitt B.J., Robbins T.W. Dissociations in dopamine release in medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum during the acquisition and extinction of classical aversive conditioning in the rat. Eur J Neurosci. 10:1998;1019-1026.
47. Winer B.J. Statistical principles in experimental design. 1971;McGraw-Hill, New York.
48. Yamamuro Y., Hori K., Iwano H., Nomura M. The relationship between learning performance and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex of the rat. Neurosci Lett. 177:1994;83-86.
49. Zahm D.S., Jensen S.L., Williams E.S., Martin J.R. III. Direct comparison of projections from the central amygdaloid region and nucleus accumbens shell. Eur J Neurosci. 11:1999;1119-1126.