Routine outcome measurement by mental health-care providers [13] (multiple letters)

Lancet

Volumn 361, Issue 9363, 2003, Pages 1137-1138

  Trauer, Tom ^a   Callaly, Tom ^b   Coombs, Tim ^c   Berk, Michael ^d  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b BARWON HEALTH   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION; LETTER; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS; AUSTRALIA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; NOTE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AUSTRALIA; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; CLINICAL TRIALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037471866     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12897-8     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. D Bilsker EM Goldner Routine outcome measurement by mental health-care providers: is it worth doing? Lancet 360 2002 1689 1690
2. BM Ogles KM Lunnen Assessing outcome in practice J Mental Health 5 1996 35 46
3. PE Meehl Clinical versus statistical prediction: a theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence 1954 University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis
4. J Ventura MF Green A Shaner RP Liberman Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: “the drift busters” Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 3 1993 221 244