Annotating nucleic acid-binding function based on protein structure

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 326, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1065-1079

  Stawiski, Eric W ^a   Gregoret, Lydia M ^a   Mandel Gutfreund, Yael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrostatics; Function prediction; Nucleic acid binding; Structural genomics; Surface patches

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; NUCLEIC ACID; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; DNA BINDING MOTIF; ELECTRICITY; GENOMICS; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SURFACE CHARGE;

EID: 0037470573     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00031-7     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Sali A. 100,000 protein structures for the biologist. Nature Struct. Biol. 5:1998;1029-1032.
2. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:2000;235-242.
3. Vitkup D., Melamud E., Moult J., Sander C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nature Struct. Biol. 8:2001;559-566.
4. Thornton J.M., Todd A.E., Milburn D., Borkakoti N., Orengo C.A. From structure to function: approaches and limitations. Nature Struct. Biol. 7:2000;991-994.
5. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:1990;403-410.
6. Hofmann K., Bucher P., Falquet L., Bairoch A. The PROSITE database, its status in 1999. Nucl. Acids Res. 27:1999;215-219.
7. Suck D. Common fold, common function, common origin? Nature Struct. Biol. 4:1997;161-165.
8. Koppensteiner W.A., Lackner P., Wiederstein M., Sippl M.J. Characterization of novel proteins based on known protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 296:2000;1139-1152.
9. Hegyi H., Gerstein M. The relationship between protein structure and function: a comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol. 288:1999;147-164.
10. Gerlt J.A., Babbitt P.C. Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70:2001;209-246.
11. Lichtarge O., Bourne H.R., Cohen F.E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257:1996;342-358.
12. Landgraf R., Xenarios I., Eisenberg D. Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 307:2001;1487-1502.
13. Armon A., Graur D., Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. J. Mol. Biol. 307:2001;447-463.
14. Sowa M.E., He W., Slep K.C., Kercher M.A., Lichtarge O., Wensel T.G. Prediction and confirmation of a site critical for effector regulation of RGS domain activity. Nature Struct. Biol. 8:2001;234-237.
15. Blom N., Gammeltoft S., Brunak S. Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J. Mol. Biol. 294:1999;1351-1362.
16. Stahl M., Taroni C., Schneider G. Mapping of protein surface cavities and prediction of enzyme class by a self-organizing neural network. Protein Eng. 13:2000;83-88.
17. Laskowski R.A., Luscombe N.M., Swindells M.B., Thornton J.M. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci. 5:1996;2438-2452.
18. Jones S., Thornton J.M. Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J. Mol. Biol. 272:1997;121-132.
19. Gallet X., Charloteaux B., Thomas A., Brasseur R. A fast method to predict protein interaction sites from sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 302:2000;917-926.
20. Wallace A.C., Laskowski R.A., Thornton J.M. Derivation of 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases: application to Ser-His-Asp catalytic triads in the serine proteinases and lipases. Protein Sci. 5:1996;1001-1013.
21. Wallace A.C., Borkakoti N., Thornton J.M. TESS: a geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases. Application to enzyme active sites. Protein Sci. 6:1997;2308-2323.
22. Fetrow J.S., Skolnick J. Method for prediction of protein function from sequence using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm with application to glutaredoxins/thioredoxins and T1 ribonucleases. J. Mol. Biol. 281:1998;949-968.
23. Fetrow J.S., Siew N., Skolnick J. Structure-based functional motif identifies a potential disulfide oxidoreductase active site in the serine/threonine protein phosphatase-1 subfamily. FASEB J. 13:1999;1866-1874.
24. Ondrechen M.J., Clifton J.G., Ringe D. THEMATICS: a simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;12473-12478.
25. Stawiski E.W., Baucom A.E., Lohr S.C., Gregoret L.M. Predicting protein function from structure: unique structural features of proteases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97:2000;3954-3958.
26. Stawiski E.W., Mandel-Gutfreund Y., Gregoret L.M. Progress in predicting protein function from structure: unique features of O-glycosidase. Pacific Symp. Biocomput. 7:2002;637-648.
27. Ohlendorf D.H., Matthew J.B. Electrostatics and flexibility in protein-DNA interactions. Advan. Biophys. 20:1985;137-151.
28. Mandel-Gutfreund Y., Margalit H., Jernigan R.L., Zhurkin V.B. A role for CH...O interactions in protein-DNA recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1998;1129-1140.
29. Pabo C.O., Sauer R.T. Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61:1992;1053-1095.
30. Mandel-Gutfreund Y., Schueler O., Margalit H. Comprehensive analysis of hydrogen bonds in regulatory protein DNA-complexes: in search of common principles. J. Mol. Biol. 253:1995;370-382.
31. Jones S., van Heyningen P., Berman H.M., Thornton J.M. Protein-DNA interactions: a structural analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 287:1999;877-896.
32. Honig B., Sharp K., Gilson M. Electrostatic interactions in proteins. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 289:1989;65-74.
33. Boggon T.J., Shan W.S., Santagata S., Myers S.C., Shapiro L. Implication of tubby proteins as transcription factors by structure-based functional analysis. Science. 286:1999;2119-2125.
34. Arbuzova A., Wang L., Wang J., Hangyás-Mihályné G., Murray D., Honig B., McLaughlin S. Membrane binding of peptides containing both basic and aromatic residues. Experimental studies with peptides corresponding to the scaffolding region of caveolin and the effector region of MARCKS. Biochemistry. 39:2000;10330-10339.
35. Büllesbach E.E., Schwabe C. The relaxin receptor-binding site geometry suggests a novel gripping mode of interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2000;35276-35280.
36. Sheinerman F.B., Norel R., Honig B. Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:2000;153-159.
37. Nicholls A., Bharadwaj R., Honig B. GRASP: graphical representation and analysis of surface properties. Biophys. J. 64:1993.
38. Chasman D.I., Flaherty K.M., Sharp P.A., Kornberg R.D. Crystal structure of yeast TATA-binding protein and model for interaction with DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;8174-8178.
39. Stayton P.S., Sligar S.G. The cytochrome P-450cam binding surface as defined by site-directed mutagenesis and electrostatic modeling. Biochemistry. 29:1990;7381-7386.
40. Belrhali H., Yaremchuk A., Tukalo M., Larsen K., Berthet-Colominas C., Leberman R., et al. Crystal structures at 2.5 angstrom resolution of seryl-tRNA synthetase complexed with two analogs of seryl adenylate. Science. 263:1994;1432-1436.
41. Danchin A. From protein sequence to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:1999;363-367.
42. Luscombe N.M., Austin S.E., Berman H.M., Thornton J.M. An overview of the structures of protein-DNA complexes. Genome Biol. 1:2000;. REVIEWS001.
43. Davis M.E., Mandura J.D., Luty B.A., McCammon J.A. Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solution. Comp. Phys. Commun. 62:1991;187-197.
44. Nadassy K., Wodak S.J., Janin J. Structural features of protein-nucleic acid recognition sites. Biochemistry. 38:1999;1999-2017.
45. Hendsch Z.S., Tidor B. Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis. Protein Sci. 3:1994;211-226.
46. Lewis M., Rees D.C. Fractal surfaces of proteins. Science. 230:1985;1163-1165.
47. Jones S., Daley D.T., Luscombe N.M., Berman H.M., Thornton J.M. Protein-RNA interactions: a structural analysis. Nucl. Acids Res. 29:2001;943-954.
48. Laskowski R.A. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J. Mol. Graph. 13:1995;323-330. see also pp. 307-328.
49. Kisters-Woike B., Vangierdegom C., Müller-Hill B. On the conservation of protein sequences in evolution. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;419-421.
50. Madabushi S., Yao H., Marsh M., Kristensen D.M., Philippi A., Sowa M.E., Lichtarge O. Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 316:2002;139-154.
51. Lichtarge O., Sowa M.E. Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:2002;21-27.
52. Luscombe N.M., Thornton J.M. Protein-DNA interactions: amino acid conservation and the effects of mutations on binding specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 320:2002;991-1009.
53. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaeffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 25:1997;3389-3402.
54. Matthews B.W. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 405:1975;442-451.
55. Pabo C.O., Nekludova L. Geometric analysis and comparison of protein-DNA interfaces: why is there no simple code for recognition? J. Mol. Biol. 301:2000;597-624.
56. Suzuki M. A framework for the DNA-protein recognition code of the probe helix in transcription factors: the chemical and stereochemical rules. Structure. 2:1994;317-326.
57. McCullogh P., Nelder J. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd edit. 1989;Chapman and Hill, London.
58. Berman H.M., Olson W.K., Beveridge D.L., Westbrook J., Gelbin A., Demeny T., et al. The nucleic acid database. A comprehensive relational database of three-dimensional structures of nucleic acids. Biophys. J. 63:1992;751-759.
59. Hobohm U., Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci. 3:1994;522-524.
60. McDonald I.K., Thornton J.M. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 238:1994;777-793.
61. Jorgensen W.L., Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS potential functions for proteins. Energy minimization for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110:1988;1657-1666.
62. Ferrin T.E., Huang C.C., Jarvis L.E., Langridge R. The MIDAS display system. J. Mol. Graph. 6:1988;13-27. see also pp. 36-37.
63. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 22:1983;2577-2637.
64. Lee B., Richards F.M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55:1971;379-400.
65. Gerstein M. A resolution-sensitive procedure for comparing protein surfaces and its application to the comparison of antigen-combining sites. Acta Crystallog. 48:1992;271-276.
66. Goodman P. NevProp Software Version. 3rd edit. 1996;University of Nevada, Renvo, NV.