Latent class model diagnostics - A review and some proposals

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 41, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 549-559

  Formann, Anton K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bootstrapping; Goodness of fit; Local independence; Odds ratios; Residual analysis

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SAMPLING;

RESIDUAL ANALYSIS;

STATISTICAL TESTS;

NUMERICAL METHOD;

EID: 0037469117     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00186-X     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andersen, E.B., 1990. The Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data. Springer, Berlin.
2. Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E., Holland, P.W., 1975. Discrete Multivariate Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge.
3. Clogg, C.C., 1979. Some latent structure models for the analysis of Likert-type data. Soc. Sci. Res. 8, 287-301.
4. 2 tests. Biometrics 10, 417-451.
5. Collins, L.M., Fidler, P.L., Wugalter, S.E., Long, J.D., 1993. Goodness-of-fit testing for latent class models. Multivar. Behav. Res. 28, 375-389.
6. de Menezes, L.M., 1999. On fitting latent class models for binary data: the estimation of standard errors British J. Math. Statist. Psychol. 52, 149-168.
7. Efron, B., 1982. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
8. Formann, A.K., 1982. Linear logistic latent class analysis. Biometr. J. 24, 171-190.
9. Formann, A.K., 1992. Linearlogistic latent class analysis forpolytomous data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87, 476-486.
10. Freeman, M.F., Tukey, J.W., 1950. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann. Math. Statist. 21, 607-611.
11. Garrett, E.S., Zeger, S.L., 2000. Latent class model diagnosis. Biometrics 56, 1055-1067.
12. Haberman, S.J., 1973. The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics 29, 205-220.
13. Noreen, E.W., 1989. Computer Intensive Methods forTesting Hypotheses: An Introduction. Wiley, New York.
14. Pearson, K., 1900. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philos. Mag. 50, 157-172.
15. Rao, C.R., 1973. Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications. Wiley, New York.
16. Read, T.R.C., Cressie, N.A.C., 1988. Goodness of Fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Springer, New York.
17. Reiser, M., 1996. Analysis of residuals for the multinomial item response model. Psychometrika 61, 509-528.
18. Reiser, M., Lin, Y., 1999. A goodness-of-fit test for the latent class model when expected frequencies are small. In: Sobel, M.E., Becker, M.P. (Eds.), Sociological Methodology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 81-111.
19. Rudas, T., Clogg, C.C., Lindsay, B.G., 1994. A new index of 2t based on mixture methods for the analysis of contingency tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 56, 623-639.
20. van de Pol, F., Langeheine, R., de Jong, W., 2000. Panmark, Vol. 3. Assessment Systems Corporation, Saint Paul.
21. Vermunt, J.K., 1997. ℓEM: a general program for the analysis of categorical data. User's Manual. Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
22. Vermunt, J.K., Magidson, J. Latent GOLD's user's guide. Statistical Innovations Inc., Boston, forthcoming.
23. von Davier, M., 1995. WINMIRA V 1.741 for Windows 3.x. IPN, Kiel.
24. Wilks, S.S., 1938. The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann. Math. Statist. 9, 60-62.