Structure preserving feature selection in PARAFAC using a genetic algorithm and Procrustes analysis

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 83-95

  Wu, Wen ^a   Guo, Q ^b   Massart, D L ^b   Boucon, C ^c   De Jong, S ^c  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

^b PHARMACEUTICAL INSTITUTE   (Belgium)

^c UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Feature selection; Genetic algorithm; Multi way analysis; Parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC); Procrustes analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INFORMATION; PARALLEL DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0037469084     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7439(02)00105-3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Vandeginste B.G.M., Massart D.L., Buydens L.C.M., de Jong S., Lewi P.J., Smeyers-Verbeke J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part B. 1998;Elsevier, Amsterdam.
2. Bro R. PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 38:1997;149-171.
3. Bro R. Multiway calibration. Multilinear PLS. Journal of Chemometrics. 10:1996;47-61.
4. Bro R., Workman J.J., Mobley P.R., Kowalski B.R. Review of chemometrics applied to spectroscopy: 1985-95, Part 3 - multi-way analysis. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews. 32:1997;237-261.
5. Czarnik A.W. Combinatorial chemistry. Analytical Chemistry. 70:1998;378A-386A.
6. Geladi P. Analysis of multi-way (multi-mode) data. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 7:1989;11-30.
7. Guo Q., Wu W., Massart D.L., Boucon C., de Jong S. Feature selection in principal component analysis of analytical data. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 61:2002;123-132.
8. Guo Q., Wu W., Questier F., Massart D.L., Boucon C., de Jong S. Sequential projection pursuit using genetic algorithms for data mining of analytical data. Analytical Chemistry. 72:2000;2846-2855.
9. Louwerse D.J., Kiers H.A.L., Smilde A.K. Cross-validation of multi-way component models. Journal of Chemometrics. 13:1999;491-510.
10. R. Bro, H.A.L. Kiers, A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models, Journal of Chemometrics (in press).
11. Krzanowski W.J. Selection of variables to preserve multivariate data structure, using principal components. Applied Statistics. 36:1987;22-33.
12. Gower J.C. Generalised Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika. 40:1975;33-51.
13. Leardi R., Boggia R., Terrile M. Genetic algorithms as a strategy for feature selection. Journal of Chemometrics. 6:1992;267-281.
14. Leardi R. Application of genetic algorithms to feature selection under full validation conditions and to outlier detection. Journal of Chemometrics. 8:1994;65-79.
15. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimisation and Machine Learning. 1989;Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.
16. Lucasius C.B., Kateman G. Understanding and using genetic algorithms: Part 1. Concepts, properties and context. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 19:1993;1-33.
17. http://www.models.kvl.dk/research/source.
18. Guo Q., Wu W., Massart D.L., Boucon C., de Jong S. Feature selection in sequential projection pursuit. Analytica Chimica Acta. 446:2001;85-96.
19. http://www.models.kvl.dk/research/data.
20. R. Bro, Multi-way analysis in the food industry. Models, Algorithms, and Applications, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (NL) and Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (DK), 1998, pp. 196-203.
21. Wu W., Guo Q., de Jong S., Massart D.L. Randomisation test for the number of dimensions of the group average space in generalised Procrustes analysis. Food Quality and Preference. 13:2002;191-200.
22. W. Wu, Validation of consensus between proteomic/genomic expression and clinical chemical data by a new randomisation F-test in generalised Procrustes analysis, Oral Presentation at the Eighth Chemometrics in Analytical Chemistry Conference, 9/22-26/2002, Seattle, USA.
23. Gonzalez-Arjona D., Lopez-Perez G., Gonzalez A.G. Holmes, a program for performing Procrustes transformations. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 57:2001;133-137.
24. Gonzalez-Arjona D., Lopez-Perez G., Gonzalez A.G. Performing Procrustes discriminant analysis with HOLMES. Talanta. 49:1999;189-197.
25. Anderson C.E., Kalivas J.H. Fundamentals of calibration transfer through Procrustes analysis. Applied Spectroscopy. 53:1999;1268-1276.
26. King J.R., Jackson D.A. Variable selection in large environmental data sets using principal components analysis. Environmetrics. 10:1999;67-77.
27. Scarponi G., Moret I., Capodaglio G., Romanazzi M. Cross-validation, influential observations and selection of variables in chemometric studies of wines by principal component analysis. Journal of Chemometrics. 4:1990;217-240.
28. Scarminio L., Kubista M. Analysis of correlated spectral data. Analytical Chemistry. 65:1993;409-416.
29. Kubista M. A new method for the analysis of correlated data using Procrustes rotation which is suitable for spectral analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 7:1990;273-279.
30. Bessant C., Brereton R.G., Dunkerley S. Integrated processing of triply coupled diode array liquid chromatography electrospray mass spectrometric signals by chemometric methods. Analyst. 124:1999;1733-1744.
31. Demir C., Hindmarch P., Brereton R.G. Procrustes analysis for the determination of number of significant masses in gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Analyst. 121:1996;1443-1449.
32. Brereton R.G., McCalley D.V. Procrustes analysis for the comparison of test methods in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography of basic compounds. Analyst. 124:1999;227-238.