Lack of anti-D in women at birth following antepartum immune globulin prophylaxis

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-46

  Rudensky, Bernard ^a   Mazaki, Eyal ^a   Na'amad, Mira ^a   Samueloff, Arnon ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Antepartum; Anti D; Prophylaxis

Indexed keywords

RHESUS D ANTIBODY;

ANTIBODY DETECTION; ARTICLE; CELL TRANSFER; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FETUS CELL; HUMAN; IMMUNIZATION; PLACENTAL TRANSFER; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0037467394     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00310-X     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Kennedy M.S., McNanie J., Waheed A. Detection of anti-D following antepartum injections of Rh immune globulin. Immunohematology. 14:1998;138-140.
2. Urbaniak S.J. The scientific basis of antenatal prophylaxis. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 105(Suppl. 18):1998;11-18.
3. Contreras M. The prevention of Rh haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn - general background. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 105(Suppl. 18):1998;7-10.
4. Bowman J.M., Pollock J.M. Failures of intravenous Rh immune globulin prophylaxis: an analysis of the reasons for such failures. Transfus. Med. Rev. 1:1987;101-112.