The Impact of United States Law on Medicine as a Profession

JAMA

Volumn 289, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1546-1556

  Rosenbaum, Sara ^a,b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HUMAN RIGHTS; LAW; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NEGLIGENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; CIVIL RIGHTS; CLINICAL MEDICINE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECONOMICS; EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT 1986; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; ETHICS; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT RIGHT;

EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT 1986; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; LEGAL APPROACH;

CIVIL RIGHTS; CLINICAL MEDICINE; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; ECONOMIC COMPETITION; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; ETHICS, CLINICAL; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HEALTH POLICY; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; LIABILITY, LEGAL; PATIENT RIGHTS; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037467299     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.12.1546     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. The physician as a social economic factor [JAMA 100 Years Ago] JAMA. 1902; 38:1688-1689; reprinted JAMA. 2002;287:3179.
2. The physician as a social economic factor [JAMA 100 Years Ago] JAMA. 1902; 38:1688-1689; reprinted JAMA. 2002;287:3179.
3. Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1982:144.
4. Friedman L. Law in America: A Short History. New York, NY: Modern Library Chronicles; 2002.
5. Cummings J. Doctors' activism revives malpractice legislation. Wall Street Journal. January 13, 2003:A4.
6. Druss BG, Marcus SC, Olfson M, Tanielianv, Pincus HA. Trends in care by non-physician clinicians in the US. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:130-137.
7. Gebbiek K, Rosenstock L, Hernandez LM, eds, and the Committe on Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st Century. Who Will Keep the Public Healthy? Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
8. Rosenblatt R, Law S, Rosenbaum S. Law and the American Health Care System. New York, NY: Foundation Press; 1997.
9. Rosenblatt R, Rosenbaum S, Frankford D. Law and the American Health Care System: 2001-2002 Supplement. New York, NY: Foundation Press; 2001.
10. Furrow BR, Jost TS, Schwartz RL, Johnson SH. Health Law: Cases, Materials and Problems (American Case Series). 4th ed. St Paul, Minn: West Publishing; 2001.
11. Havighurst CC, Blumstein JF, Brennan T. Healthcare Law and Policy: Readings, Notes, and Questions (University Casebook Series). 2nd ed. New York, NY: Foundation Press; 2002.
12. DeShaney v Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 US 189 (1989).
13. Hurley v Eddingfield, 59 NE 2d 1058 (Ind 1901).
14. Campbell v Mincey, 413 F Supp 16 (ND Miss 1975), aff'd 542 F 2d 573 (5th Cir 1976).
15. Smith DB. Health Care Divided: Race and Healing a Nation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1999.
16. Hill-Burton Act, 42 USC §291 et seq.
17. Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, 42 USC §1395dd (2000).
18. Summers v Baptist Medical Center Arkadelphia, 91 F3d 1132 (8th Cir 1996) (en banc).
19. In the Matter of Baby K, 16 F 3d 590 (4th Cir 1994); cert den 115 S Ct91 (1994).
20. Scofield G. Medical futility judgments: discriminating or discriminatory. Seton Hall Law Rev. 1995;25:927-948.
21. Bonano MA. The case of Baby K: exploring the concept of medical futility, Ann Health Law. 1995;4:151-172
22. Cantwell RD. An anencephalic child kept alive through the fourth circuit's interpretation of the emergency medical treatment and active labor act: a "medical miracle" or a "living corpse"? St Louis Univ Public Health Law Rev. 1994;14:323-346.
23. Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 US §2000d (2000).
24. Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 USC §12101 et seq (2000).
25. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 45 CFR §80.1 et seq (2000).
26. Smedley BD, Stitch AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
27. Perez T. The civil rights dimensions of racial and ethnic disparities in health care, unequal treatment. In: Smedley BD, Stitch AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002:626-663.
28. Department of Health and Human Resources, Office for Civil Rights, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Policy Guidance on the Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination As it Affects Persons With Limited English Proficiency, 65 Federal Register. 52762 (August 30, 2000). Available at: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov /cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2000_register& docid=00-22140-filed. Accessed February 28, 2003.
29. Department of Health and Human Resources, Office for Civil Rights, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Policy Guidance on the Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination As It Affects Persons With Limited English Proficiency, 65 Federal Register. 4968 (August 30, 2000). Available at: http://www .hhs.gov/ocr/lep/guide.html. Accessed February 28, 2002.
30. Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Prohibition of Discrimination by Public Accomodations, 42 USC §12182 (2000).
31. Bragdon v Abbott, 524 US 624 (1998).
32. Slater v Baker and Stapelton, 95 Eng Rep 860 (Kings Bench 1767).
33. Small v Howard, 128 Mass 131, 132 (1880).
34. Shilkret v Annapolis Emergency Hospital Ass'n, 349 A 2d 245, 249-250 (Md 1975).
35. Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 US 579 (1993).
36. Reid KE, Rose SG. The Daubert decision: effects on the admissibility of scientific evidence and testimony. In: Guidotti TL, Rose SG, eds. Science on the Witness Stand. Evaluating Scientific Evidence in Law, Adjudication, and Policy. Beverly Farms, Mass: OEM Press; 2001:81-99.
37. The T. J. Hooper, 60 F 2d 737 (2nd Cir 1932).
38. Helling v Carey, 519 P 2d 981 (Wash 1974)
39. Washington v Washington Hospital Center, 579 A 2d 177 (DC App 1990).
40. Hall v Hilbun, 466 So 2d 856 (Miss 1985).
41. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital, 105 NE 92 (NY 1914).
42. Canterbury v Spencer, 4642d 772 (DC Cir 1972).
43. Jones JH. Bad Blood: The Tuskeegee Syphilis Experiment. New York, NY: Free Press; 1994.
44. Brown v Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954) (USSC+).
45. Greaney T. Whither antitrust? the uncertain future of competition in health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21:185-197.
46. Muris T. Everything old is new again: health care and competition in the 21st century. Presented at: 7th Annual Competition for Health Care Forum; November 7, 2002; Chicago, Ill. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/muris /murishealthcarespeech0211.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2003.
47. California Retail Liquor Dealers Association v Midcal Aluminum Inc, 445 US 97 (1980).
48. Goldfarb v Virginia State Bar, 421 US 773 (1975).
49. Arizona v Maricopa County Medical Society, 457 US 332 (1982).
50. Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 USC §1001 et seq (2000).
51. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co v Massachusetts, 471 US 724 (1985).
52. Kartell v Blue Shield of Massachusetts Inc, 749 F 2d 922 (1st Cir 1984); cert den 471 US 1029 (1985).
53. Patrick v Burget, 486 US 94 (1988).
54. Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA), 42 USC 11101-11152 (2000).
55. Wilk v American Medical Association, 719 F 2d 207 (7th Cir 1983).
56. Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 USC §1 (1890).
57. Pegram v Herdrich, 530 US 211 (2000).
58. In re US Healthcare Inc, 193 F 3d 151 (3rd Cir 1999) cert den sub nom. US Healthcare v Bauman, 530 US 1242 (2000).
59. Pappas v Asbel, 768 A 2d 1089 (2001); cert den sub nom. US Healthcare Systems Inc v Pennsylvania Hospital Insurance Co, 122 S Ct. 2618 (2002).
60. Rush Prudential HMO v Moran, 536 US 355 (2002).
61. Ciccio v Vytra Healthcare, 2003 Westlaw 283150_F3d_(2d Cir 2003).