A spiro-fused triarylaminium radical cation with a triplet ground state (Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2003) 42 (921-924) DOI:10.1002/anie.200390244);A spiro-fused triarylaminium radical cation with a triplet ground state

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 921-924

  Ito, Akihiro ^a   Urabe, Masashi ^a   Tanaka, Kazuyoshi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

EPR spectroscopy; Magnetic properties; Radical ions; Spiro compounds

Indexed keywords

FERROMAGNETISM; GROUND STATE; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE; POSITIVE IONS; QUANTUM THEORY;

TRIPLET GROUND STATE;

ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

AMINE; CATION; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL; SPIRO COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; MAGNETISM; MEASUREMENT; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; POLYMERIZATION; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037463064     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200990167     Document Type: Erratum

References (29)

1. P. Maslak, M. P. Augustine, J. D. Burkey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5339-5360.
2. K. Ueda, M. Yamanoha, T. Sugimoto, H. Fujita, A. Ugawa, K. Yakushi, K. Kano, Chem. Lett. 1997, 461-462.
3. X. Chi, M. E. Itkis, B. D. Patrick, T. M. Barclay, R. W. Reed, R. T. Oakley, A. W. Cordes, R. C. Haddon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10395-10402.
4. L. McElwee-White, W. A. Goddard III, D. A. Dougherty, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3461-3466.
5. L. McElwee-White, D. A. Dougherty, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3466-3474.
6. N. L. Frank, R. Clérac, J.-P. Sutter, N. Daro, O. Kahn, C. Coulon, M. T. Green, S. Golhen, L. Ouahab, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2053-2061.
7. H. Dürr, R. Gleiter, Angew. Chem. 1978, 90, 591-601; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 559-569.
8. H. Dürr, R. Gleiter, Angew. Chem. 1978, 90, 591-601; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 559-569.
9. A. R. Forrester, J. M. Hay, R. H. Thomson, Organic Chemistry of Stable Free Radicals, Academic Press, New York, 1968.
10. Gaussian 98 (Revision A.7), M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
11. D. Wittenberg, H. A. McNince, H. Gilman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5418-5422.
12. For examples, see M. S. Newman, Effects in Organic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1956; L. N. Ferguson, The Modern Structural Theory of Organic Chemistry. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963.
13. For examples, see M. S. Newman, Effects in Organic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1956; L. N. Ferguson, The Modern Structural Theory of Organic Chemistry. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963.
14. a) M. Beller, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1436-1437; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1316;
15. a) M. Beller, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1436-1437; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1316;
16. b) J. F. Hartwig, Synlett 1997, 329;
17. c) J. F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2154-2177; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2046-2067;
18. c) J. F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2154-2177; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2046-2067;
19. d) J. P. Wolfe, S. Wagaw, J.-F. Marcoux, S. L. Buchwald, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 805;
20. e) J. F. Hartwig, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 852.
21. 6Si: C 72.60, H 5.51, N 4.03; found: C 72.41, H 5.44, N 3.97.
22. + under the same conditions. This discrepancy of the first oxidation potential between 1 and trianisylamine probably results from a difference in conformation of the trianisylamine moieties. In 1, the propellerlike conformation can be hardly adopted because of its spiro structure.
23. 2Si: C 36.99, H 2.81, N 2.05, Cl 31.19; found: C 36.99, H 2.71, N 2.05, Cl 29.61.
24. 2, and the ESR signal intensity was compared to that of a sample oxidized in situ at the same concentration. The two signals gave the same fine structure with almost the same intensity.
25. 2: H. Bock, A. Rauschenbach, K. Ruppert, Z. Havlas, Angew. Chem. 1991,103, 706-708; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 714-716.
26. 2: H. Bock, A. Rauschenbach, K. Ruppert, Z. Havlas, Angew. Chem. 1991,103, 706-708; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 714-716.
27. N. Hirota, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 32-41.
28. K. Mukai, A. Sogabe, J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 598-601.
29. B. Bleaney, K. D. Bowers, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 1952, 214, 451-456.