Influence of naked barley cultivar with normal, amylose-rich or amylopectin-rich starch and enzyme supplementation on digestibility and piglet performance

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 104, Issue 1-4, 2003, Pages 121-131

  Lindberg, Jan Erik ^a   Arvidsson, Anna ^a   Wang, Jiufeng ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Barley cultivar; Digestibility; Enzyme; Growth; Piglets

Indexed keywords

HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE;

EID: 0037456536     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00320-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Almirall, M., Francesch, M., Perez-Vendrell, A.M., Brufau, J., Esteve-Garcia, E., 1995. The differences in intestinal viscosity produced by barley and β-glucanase later digesta enzyme activities and ileal nutrient digestibilities more in broiler chicks than in cocks. J. Nutr. 125, 947-955.
2. Åman, P., Newman, C.W., 1986. Chemical composition of some different types of barley grown in Montana, USA. J. Cereal Sci. 4, 133-141.
3. Åman, P., Hesselman, K., Tilly, A.-C., 1985. The variation in chemical composition of Swedish barleys. J. Cereal Sci. 3, 73-77.
4. Auldist, D.E., Stevenson, F.L., Kerr, M.G., Eason, P., King, R.H., 1997. Lysine requirements of pigs from 2 to 7 kg live weight. Anim. Sci. 65, 501-507.
5. Bach Knudsen, K.E., Jørgensen, H., 2001. Intestinal degradation of dietary carbohydrates-from birth to maturity. In: Lindberg, J.E., Ogle, B. (Eds.), Digestive Physiology of Pigs. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK, pp. 109-120.
6. Bedford, M.R., 1995. Mechanism of action and potential environmental benefits from the use of feed enzymes. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 53, 145-155.
7. Bedford, M.R., Patience, J.F., Classen, H.L., Inborr, J., 1992. The effect of dietary enzyme supplementation of rye and barley-based diets on digestion and subsequent performance in pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 97-105.
8. Chesson, A., 1987. Supplementary enzymes to improve the utilization of pig and poultry diets. In: Haresign, W., Cole, D.J.A. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Butterworths, London, UK, pp. 71-89.
9. Chung, T.K., Baker, D.H., 1992. Ideal amino acid pattern for 10-kg pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 20, 3102-3111.
10. Dierick, N.A., 1989. Biotechnology aids to improve feed and feed digestion: enzymes and fermentation. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 39, 241-261.
11. Dierick, N.A., Decuypere, J.A., 1994. Enzymes and growth in pigs. In: Cole, D.J.A., Wiseman, J., Varley, M.A. (Eds.), Principles of Pig Science. Nottingham University Press, UK, pp. 169-195.
12. Evers, A.D., Blakeney, A.B., O'Brien, L., 1999. Cereal structure and composition. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50, 629-650.
13. French, D., 1984. Organization of starch granules. In: Whistler, R.L., BeMiller, J.N., Paschall, E.F. (Eds.), Starch Chemistry and Technology, second ed. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 183-247.
14. Gary, M.G., 1991. Starch digestion and absorption on non-ruminants. J. Nutr. 122, 172-177.
15. Graham, H., Fadel, J.G., Newman, C.W., Newman, R.K., 1989. Effect of pelleting and β-glucanase supplementation on the ileal and fecal digestibility of a barley-based diet in the pig. J. Anim. Sci. 67, 1293-1298.
16. Guenter, W., 1993. Impact of feed enzymes on nutrient utilization of ingredients in growing poultry. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 2, 82-84.
17. Guilbot, A., Mercier, C., 1985. Starch. In: Aspinall, G.O. (Ed.), The Polysaccharides, vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 209-282.
18. Hesselman, K., Åman, P., 1986. The effect of β-glucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chickens fed on barley of low- or high-viscosity. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 15, 83-93.
19. Inborr, J., Schmitz, M., Ahrens, F., 1993. Effect of adding fiber and starch degrading enzymes to a barley/wheat based diet on performance and nutrient digestibility in different segments of the small intestine of early weaned pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 44, 113-127.
20. Newman, C.W., Eslick, R.F., Pepper, J.W., El-Negoumy, A.M., 1980. Performance of pigs fed hulless and covered barleys supplemented with and without a bacterial diastase. Nutr. Rep. Int. 22, 833-837.
21. Oscarsson, M., Andersson, R., Salomonsson, A.-C., Åman, P., 1996. Chemical composition of barley samples focusing on dietary fiber components. J. Cereal Sci. 24, 161-170.
22. Peddie, J., Dewar, W.A., Gilbert, A.B., Waddington, D., 1982. The use of titanium dioxide for determining apparent digestibility in mature domestic fowls (Gallus domesticus). J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 99, 233-236.
23. Pettersson, Å, Lindberg, J.E., 1997. Ileal and total tract digestibility in pigs of naked and hulled barley with different starch composition. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 66, 97-109.
24. Pettersson, D., Graham, H., Åman, P., 1990. Enzyme supplementation of low or high crude protein concentration diets for broiler chickens. Anim. Prod. 51, 399-404.
25. SAS Institute Inc., 1990. SAS/STAT® User's Guide (Release 6.03). SAS Insititute Inc., Cary, NC.
26. Thacker, P.A., Campbell, G.L., GrootWassink, J., 1991. The effect of enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of rye-based diets for swine. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 489-496.
27. Thacker, P.A., Campbell, G.L., GrootWassink, J., 1992. The effect of organic acids and enzyme supplementation on the performance of pigs fed barley-based diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 395-402.
28. Thacker, P.A., Campbell, G.L., GrootWassink, J.W.D., 1988. The effect of beta-glucanase supplementation on the performance of pigs fed hulless barley. Nutr. Rep. Int. 38, 91-99.
29. White, W.B., Bird, H.R., Sunde, M.L., Marlett, J.A., 1983. Viscosity of β-glucan as a factor in the improvement of barley for chicks. Poultry Sci. 62, 853-862.
30. Zobel, H.F., 1988. Molecules to granules: a comprehensive starch review. Starch/Stärke 40, 44-50.