Why fuzzy script J sign -equivalence relations do not resolve the Poincaré paradox, and related issues

Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 181-192

  De Cock, Martine ^a   Kerre, Etienne ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Approximate equality; Fuzzy script J sign equivalence relation; Nearness relation; Poincar paradox; Resemblance relation

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ERRORS; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEMANTICS;

RESEMBLANCE RELATIONS;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 0037448304     PISSN: 01650114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00244-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. U. Bodenhofer, A note on approximate equality versus the Poincaré paradox, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 133 (2) (2003), this issue.
2. D. Boixader, On the relationship between T -transitivity and approximate equality, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 133 (2) (2003), this issue.
3. M. De Cock, E.E. Kerre, A new class of fuzzy modifiers, in: Proc. 30th IEEE Internat. Symp. on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL2000), IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring, MD, 2000, pp. 121-126.
4. M. De Cock, E.E. Kerre, The representation of linguistic hedges using fuzzy relational calculus,in: Proc. IFSA/NAFIPS 2001, vol. 3, 2001, pp. 1608-1613.
5. M. De Cock, E.E. Kerre, Fuzzy modifiers based on fuzzy relations, Information Sciences, in preparation.
6. M. De Cock, E.E. Kerre, On (un)suitable fuzzy relations to model approximate equality, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 133 (2) (2003), this issue.
7. De Cock M., Nachtegael M., Kerre E.E. Images under fuzzy relations. a master-key to fuzzy applications Ruan D., Abderrahim H.A., D'hondt P., Kerre E.E. Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing in Nuclear Science and Engineering. 2000;47-54 World Scientific, Singapore.
8. Dobrakovová J. Indistinguishability and nearness. Busefal. 83:2000;46-52.
9. Fodor J., Roubens M. Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. 1994;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.
10. H.P. Grice, Further notes on logic and conversation,in: P. Cole, (Ed.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp. 113-128.
11. H. Hellendoorn, Reasoning with fuzzy Logic, Ph.D. Thesis, T.U. Delft, 1990.
12. Hersh H.M., Caramazza A. A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language. J. Exp. Psychol.: General. 105(3):1976;254-276.
13. V. Janiš, Resemblance is a nearness, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 133 (2) (2003), this issue.
14. Kalina M. Fuzzy limits and fuzzy nearness relation. Reusch B. Computational Intelligence. Theory and Applications, Proc. 7th Fuzzy Days Dortmund Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 2206:2001;755-761 Springer, Berlin.
15. E.E. Kerre, Introduction to the basic principles of fuzzy set theory and some of its applications, Communication and Cognition, Gent (1993).
16. F. Klawonn, Should fuzzy equality and similarity satisfy transitivity? Comments on the paper by M. De Cock and E. Kerre, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 133 (2) (2003), this issue.
17. Lakoff G. Hedges. A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts J. Philos. Logic. 2:1973;458-508.
18. Novák V., Perfilieva I. Evaluating linguistic expressions and functional fuzzy theories in fuzzy logic. Zadeh L.A., Kacprzyck J. Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems 1: Foundations. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. vol. 33:1999;383-406 Springer, Heidelberg.
19. E. Orlowska, A. Radzikowska, Information relations and operators based on double residuated lattices, in: H. de Swart (Ed.), Proc. 6th Internat. Workshop on Relational Methods in Computer Science (RELMICS'6), 2001, pp. 185-199.
20. Poincaré H. La Science et l'Hypothèse. 1902;Flammarion, Paris.
21. E. Tsiporkova, H.-J. Zimmermann, Aggregation of compatibility and equality: a new class of similarity measures for fuzzy sets, in: Proc. IPMU, 1998, pp. 1769-1776.
22. Zadeh L.A. A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. J. Cybernet. 2(3):1972;4-34.