Recent trends and racial/ethnic differences in the incidence and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in California women

Cancer

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1099-1106

  Innos, Kaire ^a,b   Horn Ross, Pamela L ^a  

^a NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Tallinn   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; California; Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); Incidence; Mastectomy; Screening mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ASIAN AMERICANS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0037441771     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11104     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ernster V, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson I. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA. 1996;275:913-918.
2. Swanson J, Ragheb N, Lin C-S, et al. Breast cancer among black and white women in the 1980s. Cancer. 1993;72:788-798.
3. Schwartz G, Solin L, Olivotto I, Ernster V, Pressman P. The Consensus Conference on the Treatment of in Situ Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast, April 22-25, 1999. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:131-139.
4. Simon M, Szhwartz A, Martino S, Swanson G. Trends in the diagnosis of in situ breast cancer in the Detroit metropolitan area, 1973-1987. Cancer. 1992;69:466-469.
5. Zheng T, Holford T, Chen Y, Jones B, Flannery J, Boyle P. Time trend of female breast carcinoma in situ by race and histology in Connecticut, U.S.A. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33:96-100.
6. Adams-Cameron M, Gilliland F, Hunt W, Key C. Trends in incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in Hispanic, American Indian, and Non-Hispanic White women in New Mexico, 1973-1994. Cancer. 1999;85:1084-1090.
7. Snipes K. Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer, 1988-1993. In: Morris C, Wright W, editors. Breast cancer in California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, 1996:5-22.
8. Miller B, Kolonel L, Bernstein L, et al., editors. Racial/ethnic patterns of cancer in the United States 1988-1992. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 1996 NIH Pub. No. 96-4104.
9. Sakorafas G, Tsiotou A. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev. 2000;26: 103-125.
10. Skinner K, Silverstein M. The management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2001;8:33-45.
11. Winchester D, Herman R, Winchester D. National treatment trends for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Arch Surg. 1997;132:660-665.
12. Choi WS, Parker BA, Pierce JP, Greenberg ER. Regional differences in the incidence and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5:317-320.
13. Shavers V, Brown M. Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:334-357.
14. California Cancer Registry, August 2001 Submission. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, 2001.
15. Kwong SL, Perkins CI, Morris CR, Cohen R, Allen M, Wright WE. Cancer in California: 1988-1999. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, 2001.
16. Stewart SL, Swallen KC, Glaser SL, Horn-Ross PL, West DW. Adjustment of cancer incidence rates for ethnic misclassification. Biometrics. 1998;54:774-781.
17. Department of Finance, State of California. Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail, 1970-2040 [database online]. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Finance, 1998.
18. Department of Finance, State of California. Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail, 1997. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Finance, 1999.
19. Department of Finance, State of California. Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail, 1998. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Finance, 2000.
20. SEER*Stat. Computer program. Version 4.13. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2001.
21. California Behavioral Risk Factor Survey datasets 1988-2000. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, 2001.
22. California Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. SAS dataset documentation and technical report. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, 2002. Available from URL: http://www.surveyresearchgroup.com/UserFiles/BRFS01Doc. pdf [accessed June 18, 2002].
23. Liff J, Sung J, Chow W-H, Greenberg R, Flanders W. Does increased detection account for the rising incidence of breast cancer? Am J Public Health. 1991;81:462-465.
24. Simon M, Lemanne D, Schwartz A, Martino S, Swanson G. Recent trends in the incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer in the Detroit metropolitan area (1975-1988). Cancer. 1993;71:769-774.
25. Hankey B, Miller B, Curtis R, Kosary C. Trends in breast cancer in younger women in contrast to older women. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst. 1994; 16:7-14.
26. Kaplan RM, Navarro AM, Castro FG, et al. Increased use of mammography among Hispanic women: baseline results from the NCI Cooperative Group on Cancer Prevention in Hispanic Communities. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:467-471.
27. Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ. Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;40:37-51.
28. Davis B. Utilization of screening mammography, 1987-1994. In: Morris C, Wright W, editors. Breast cancer in California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, 1996:61-76.
29. Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ, Stewart S, et al. Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study. Prev Med. 2001;33:190-203.
30. May DS, Lee NC, Nadel MR, Henson RM, Miller DS. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:97-104.
31. California Department of Health Services. Mammography screening among women aged 40 and older, by income status and race/ethnicity; California, 1997. Data Points. Results from the 1997 California Women's Health Survey 1999; 1:21. Available from URL: http://www.surveyresearchgroup.com/UserFiles/97dp2126.pdf [accessed/une 18, 20021.
32. Ramirez AG, Talavera GA, Villarreal R, et al. Breast cancer screening in regional Hispanic populations. Health Educ Res. 2000;15:559-568.
33. Natarajan N, Nemoto D, Nemoto T, Mettlin C. Breast cancer survival among Orientals and Whites living in the United States. J Surg Oncol. 1988;39:206-209.
34. Prehn A, Lin S, Clarke C, et al. Cancer Incidence in Chinese, Japanese and Filipinos in the US and Asia, 1988-92. Union City, CA: Northern California Cancer Center, 1999.
35. Parker J, Gebretsadik T, Sabogal F, Newman J, Lawson HW. Mammography screening among California Medicare beneficiaries: 1993-1994. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:198-205.
36. Chen VW, Correa P, Kurman RJ, et al. Histological characteristics of breast carcinoma in Blacks and Whites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994;3:127-135.
37. Jones B, Kasl S, Curnen M, Owens P, Dubrow R. Can mammography screening explain the race difference in stage at diagnosis of breast cancer? Cancer. 1995;75:2103-2113.
38. Hunter CP, Redmond CK, Chen VW, et al. Breast cancer: factors associated with stage at diagnosis in black and white women. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:1129-1137.
39. Page D, Dupont W, Rogers L, Jensen R, Schuyler P. Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15-25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy. Cancer. 1995;76:1197-2000.
40. Welch H, Black W. Using autopsy series to estimate the disease reservoir for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: how much more breast cancer can we find? Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:1023-1028.
41. Ernster V, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Wilkie H, Ballard-Barbash R. Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:953-958.
42. Morris C, Cohen R, Schlag R, Wright W. Increasing trends in the use of breast-conserving surgery in California. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:281-284.