Signal strength determines the nature of the relationship between perception and working memory

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 173-184

  Sheth, Bhavin R ^a   Shimojo, Shinsuke ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; WORKING MEMORY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037440812     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892903321208114     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Belger, A., Puce, A., Krystal, J. H., Gore, J. C., Goldman-Rakic, P., & McCarthy, G. (1998). Dissociation of mnemonic and perceptual processes during spatial and nonspatial working memory, using fMRI. Human Brain Mapping. 6, 14-32.
2. Bisaich, E., & Luzzatti, C. (1978). Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex, 14, 129-133.
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
4. Chafee, M. V., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1998). Matching patterns of activity in primate prefrontal area 8a and parietal area 7IP neurons during a spatial working memory task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 2919-2940.
5. Corballis, P. M., & Corballis, M. C. (1993). How apparent motion affects mental rotation: Push or pull? Memory and Cognition, 21, 458-466.
6. de Valois, R. L., & de Valois, K. K. (1991). Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research, 31, 1619-1626.
7. Duncker, K. (1938). Source book of gestalt psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
8. Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
9. Foster, D. H., & Bischof, W. F. (1991). Thresholds from psychometric functions: Superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators. Psychological Review, 109, 152-159.
10. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 126.
11. Funahashi, S., Bruce, C. J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1989). Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 61, 331-349.
12. Gregory, R. L. (1966). Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Ishai, A., & Sagi, D. (1995a). Common mechanisms of visual imagery and perception. Science, 268, 1772-1774.
14. Ishai, A., & Sagi, D. (1995b). Visual imagery facilitates visual perception: Psychophysical evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 476-489.
15. Kerst, S. M., & Howard, J. H. (1978). Memory psychophysics for visual area and length. Memory and Cognition, 6, 327-335.
16. Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47-60.
17. Kosslyn, S. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Felician, O., Camposano, S., Keenan, J. P., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Sukel, K. E., & Alpert, N. M. (1999). The role of Area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. Science, 284, 167-170.
18. Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
19. Mazzoni, P., Bracewell, R. M., Barash, S., & Andersen, R. A. (1996). Motor intention activity in the macaque's lateral intraparietal area: 1. Dissociation of motor plan from sensory, memory. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 1439-1456.
20. McKee, S. P., Klein, S. A., & Teller, D. Y. (1985). Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 286-298.
21. Mehta, Z., Newcombe, F., & DeHaan, E. (1992). Selective loss of imagery, in a case of visual agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 30, 645-655.
22. Murakami, I., & Shimojo, S. (1993). Motion capture changes to induced motion at higher luminance contrast, smaller eccentricities, and larger inducer sizes. Vision Research, 33, 2091-2107.
23. Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & Le Doux, J. E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406, 686-687.
24. Nakayama, K. (1985). Biological image motion processing: A review. Vision Research, 25, 625-660.
25. Nishida, S., & Johnston, A. (1999). Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature, 397, 610-612.
26. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science - photons to phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
28. Petrides, M., Alivastos, B., Evans, A. C., & Meyer, E. (1993). Dissociation of human mid-dorsolateral from posterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortexin memory processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 90, 873-877.
29. Ramachandran, V. S., & Anstis, S. M. (1990). Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges. Perception, 19, 611-616.
30. Riley, D. A. (1962). In L. Postman (Ed.), Psychology in the making. New York: Knopf.
31. Sheth, B. R., & Shimojo, S. (2000a). In space, the past can be recast but not the present. Perception, 29, 1279-1290.
32. Sheth, B. R., & Shimojo, S. (2000b). Motion of the surround drags objects in spatial memory. A motion after-after effect. Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 4204.
33. Sheth, B. R., & Shimojo, S. (2001). Compression of space in visual memory. Vision Research, 41, 329-341.
34. Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., Koeppe, R. A., Awh, E., Schumacher, E., & Minoshima, S. (1995). Spatial vs. object working memory: PET investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 337-358.
35. Snowden, R. J. (1998). Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Current Biology, 8, 1343-1345.
36. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74, 29.
37. Whitney, D., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Motion distorts visual space: Shifting the perceived position of remote stationary, objects. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 954-959.
38. Wohlgemuth, A. (1911). On the aftereffect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplements, 1, 1-117.