Internet use by a multidisciplinary transplant clinic population

Transplantation

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 155-157

  Slakey, Douglas P ^a,b   Nowfar, Sepehr ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS; SURVIVAL RATE; TELECOMMUNICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 0037439659     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200301150-00028     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001; 285(20): 2612.
2. Hellawell GO, Turner KJ, Le Monnier KJ, et al. Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics. BJU Int 2000; 86: 191.
3. O'Connor JB, Johanson JG. Use of the web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. JAMA 2000; 284(15): 1962.
4. Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, et al. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. BMJ 1999; 318 (6 March): 647.
5. Rajendran PR. MSJAMA. The Internet: ushering in a new era of medicine. JAMA 2001; 285(6): 804.
6. Guidelines for AMA web sites. JAMA 2000; 283 (12): 1602.
7. Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lun B, et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet: principles governing AMA web sites. JAMA 2000; 283(12): 1600.