Oblique reformation in cervical spine computed tomography: A new look at an old friend

Spine

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 167-170

  Roberts, Catherine C ^a,b   McDaniel, N Troy ^a   Krupinski, Elizabeth A ^a   Erly, William K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical spine; Computed tomography; Interobserver variability; Neural foraminal stenosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STENOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0037439149     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200301150-00013     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Clark KC. Positioning in Radiography. 8th ed. New York: Intercontinental Medical Book Corporation, 1967:188-9.
2. Czervionke LF, Daniels DL, Ho PS, et al. Cervical neural foramina: Correlative anatomic and MR imaging study. Radiology 1988;169:753-9.
3. Daniels DL, Hyde JS, Kneeland JB, et al. The cervical nerves and foramina: Local-coil MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:129-33.
4. Edelman RR, Stark DD, Saini S, et al. Oblique planes of section in MR imaging. Radiology 1986;159:807-10.
5. Flannigan BD, Lufkin RB, McGlade C, et al. MR imaging of the cervical spine: Neurovascular anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:785-90.
6. Glenn WV, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML. Computed tomography/multiplanar reformatted (CT/MPR) examinations of the lumbar spine. In: Genant HK, Chafetz N, Helms CA, eds. Computed Tomography of the Lumbar Spine: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications for the Radiologist, Orthopedist, and Neurosurgeon. San Francisco: University of California, 1982:87-124.
7. Heithoff KB. High-resolution computed tomography and stenosis: An evaluation of the causes and cures of the failed back surgery syndrome. In: Post MJD, ed. Computed Tomography of the Spine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1984:506-45.
8. Kaufman RL, Glenn WV Jr. Rheumatoid cervical myelopathy: Evaluation by computerized tomography with multiplanar reconstruction. J Rheumatol 1983;10:42-54.
9. Marcelis S, Seragini FC, Taylor JA, et al. Cervical spine: Comparison of 45 degrees and 55 degrees anteroposterior oblique radiographic projections. Radiology 1993;188:253-6.
10. McAfee PC, Ullrich CG, Levinsohn EM, et al. Computed tomography in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: The value of multiplanar reconstruction. Radiographics 1982;2:529-51.
11. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, et al. Cervical radiculopathy: Value of oblique MR imaging. Radiology 1987;163:227-31.
12. Pech P, Daniels DL, Williams AL, et al. The cervical neural foramina: Correlation of microtomy and CT anatomy. Radiology 1985;155:143-6.
13. Rauschning W, Rothman SLG. CT anatomy of the cervical spine in oblique reformatted planes [abstract]. Radiology 1984;153:56. [Scientific Program]
14. Yenerich, DO, Haughton VM. Oblique plane MR imaging of the cervical spine. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10:823-6.
15. Yousem DM, Atlas SW, Goldberg HI, et al. Degenerative narrowing of the cervical spine neural foramina: Evaluation with high-resolution 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:229-36.