A note on construction of nearly uniform designs with large number of runs

Statistics and Probability Letters

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 215-224

  Fang, Kai Tai ^a   Qin, Hong ^a,b  

^a HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b CENTRAL CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Computer experiment; Discrepancy; U type design; Uniform design

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037438178     PISSN: 01677152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7152(02)00357-7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bates, R.A., Buck, R.J., Riccomagno, E., Wynn, H.P., 1996. Experimental design and observation for large systems. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 58, 77-94.
2. Fang, K.T., 1980. The uniform design: application of number-theoretic methods in experimental design. Acta Math. Appl. Sinica 3, 363-372.
3. Fang, Y., 1995. Relationships between uniform design and orthogonal design. The Third International Chinese Statistical Association Statistical Conference, Beijing.
4. Fang, K.T., Hickernell, F.J., 1995. The uniform design and its applications. Bull. Inst. Internat. Statist., 50th Session, Book 1, pp. 333-349.
5. Fang, K.T., Mukerjee, R., 2000. A connection between uniformity and aberration in regular fractions of two-level factorials. Biometrika 87, 193-198.
6. Fang, K.T., Wang, Y., 1994. Number-Theoretic Methods in Statistics. Chapman & Hall, London.
7. Fang, K.T., Shiu, C.X., Pan, J.X., 1999. Uniform designs based on Latin squares. Statist. Sinica 9, 905-912.
8. Fang, K.T., Lin, D.K.J., Winker, P., Zhang, Y., 2000. Uniform design: theory and applications. Technometrics 42, 237-248.
9. Fang, K.T., Ma, C.X., Mukerjee, R., 2002a. Uniformity in fractional factorials. In: Fang, K.T., Hickernell, F.J., Niederreiter, H. (Eds.), Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp. 232-241.
10. 2-discrepancy of random sampling and Latin hypercube design, and construction of uniform design. Math. Comput. 71, 275-296.
11. Hickernell, F.J., 1998a. A generalized discrepancy and quadrature error bound. Math. Comput. 67, 299-322.
12. Hickernell, F.J., 1998b. Lattice rules: how well do they measure up? In: Hellekalek, P., Larcher, G. (Eds.), Random and Quasi-Random Point Sets, Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 138. Springer, New York, pp. 109-166.
13. Johnson, M.E., Noore, L.M., Ylvisaker, D., 1990. Minimax and maximin distance designs. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 26, 131-148.
14. Koehler, J.R., Owen, A.B., 1996. Computer experiments. In: Ghosh, S., Rao, C.R. (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 13. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 261-308.
15. McKay, M., Beckman, R., Conover, W., 1979. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21, 239-245.
16. Winker, P., Fang, K.T., 1998. Optimal U-type design. In: Niederreiter, H., Zinterhof, P., Hellekalek, P. (Eds.), Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 1996. Springer, Berlin.