Renormalized perturbation theory for Fermi systems: Fermi surface deformation and superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Neumayr, Arne ^a   Metzner, Walter ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR FESTKÖRPERFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR STABILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0037437915     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.035112     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961);
2. Phys. Rev.G. Baym, 127, 1391 (1962).
3. P. Nozières, Theory of Interacting Fermi Systems (Benjamin, New York, 1964).
4. J. Feldman, J. Magnen, V. Rivasseau, and E. Trubowitz, in The State of Matter, edited by M. Aizenmann and H. Araki, Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics Vol. 20 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
5. J. Feldman, H. Knörrer, M. Salmhofer, and E. Trubowitz, J. Stat. Phys. 94, 113 (1999).
6. See, for example, D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rep. 250, 329 (1995);
7. D. J. Scalapino and S. R. White, Found. Phys. 31, 27 (2001).
8. D. Zanchi and H. J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B 61, 13 609 (2000).
9. C. J. Halboth and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B 61, 7364 (2000).
10. C. Honerkamp, M. Salmhofer, N. Furukawa, and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 63, 035109 (2001).
11. C. J. Halboth and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5162 (2000).
12. H. Yamase and H. Kohno, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 332 (2000);
13. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.H. YamaseH. Kohno69, 2151 (2000).
14. B. Valenzuela and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Phys. Rev. B 63, 153103 (2001).
15. I. Grote, E. Körding, and F. Wegner, J. Low Temp. Phys. 126, 1385 (2002);
16. V. Hankevych, I. Grote, and F. Wegner, Phys. Rev. B 66, 094516 (2002);
17. V. Hankevych and F. Wegner, cond-mat/0207612 (unpublished).
18. See, for example, J. W. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-Particle Systems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987).
19. J. Feldman, M. Salmhofer, and E. Trubowitz, J. Stat. Phys. 84, 1209 (1996);
20. J. FeldmanM. SalmhoferE. TrubowitzCommun. Pure Appl. Math. 51, 1133 (1998);
21. Commun. Pure Appl. Math.J. FeldmanM. SalmhoferE. Trubowitz52, 273 (1999).
22. A. Georges and J. S. Yedidia, Phys. Rev. B 43, 3475 (1991).
23. This has been brought to our attention by D. Rohe.
24. See, for example, The Hubbard Model, edited by A. Montorsi (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
25. Also small numerical errors can be sufficient to start the symmetry breaking in the iteration procedure.
26. C. J. Halboth and W. Metzner, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 102, 501 (1997), and references therein.
27. H. Nojiri, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 903 (1999).
28. K. Morita and K. Miyake, Physica B 281/282, 812 (2000).
29. C. Honerkamp, P. A. Frigeri, and T. M. Rice, Eur. Phys. J. B 28, 61 (2002).
30. S. A. Kivelson, E. Fradkin, and V. J. Emery, Nature (London) 393, 550 (1998).
31. V. Oganesyan, S. A. Kivelson, and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 64, 195109 (2001).
32. M. Vojta, Y. Zhang, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4940 (2000);
33. M. VojtaY. ZhangS. SachdevInt. J. Mod. Phys. B 14, 3719 (2000).
34. For a review of the attractive Hubbard model (and extensions), see R. Micnas, J. Ranninger, and S. Robaszkiewicz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 113 (1990).
35. P. G. J. van Dongen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 757 (1991).