Research cloning, ethics, and public policy [1]

Science

Volumn 299, Issue 5613, 2003, Pages 1661-

  Walters, Leroy ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LAW; LETTER; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOLECULAR CLONING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; CLONING, ORGANISM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; PUBLIC POLICY; STEM CELLS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037436546     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. The Senate regulatory bill is entitled "A Bill to Prohibit Human Cloning and Protect Stem Cell Research" (S. 303).
2. The groups espousing this view include the Nuffield Council on Bioethics in the United Kingdom, the National Consultative Committee on Ethics in France, Israel's Bioethics Advisory Committee, Singapore's Bioethics Advisory Committee, the Dutch Health Council, and the British House of Lords Select Committee on Stem Cell Research.
3. A. Bonnicksen, Crafting a Cloning Policy (Georgetown Univ. Press, Washington, DC, 2002).
4. M. Warnock, Making Babies (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2002).
5. The states are Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Kentucky, Tennessee, Indiana, Missouri, and Washington.
6. R. Willing, USA Today, 25 Feb 2003, p. 3A.
7. L. D. Brandeis, New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann (1932).