Vortex glass and vortex liquid in oscillatory media

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2003, Pages

  Brito, Carolina ^a,b   Aranson, Igor S ^c   Chaté, Hugues ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b DIF   (France)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SOLUTIONS; TURBULENCE; VORTEX FLOW;

OSCILLATORY MEDIA; VORTEX GLASS; VORTEX LIQUID;

OSCILLATORS (ELECTRONIC);

EID: 0037435819     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. A. T. Winfree, When Time Breaks Down (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1987).
2. A. Goldbeter, Biochemical Oscillations and Cellular Rhythms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996).
3. G. Huber, P. Alstrøm, and T. Bohr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2380 (1992).
4. T. Bohr, G. Huber, and E. Ott, Europhys. Lett. 33, 589 (1996).
5. H. Chaté and P. Manneville, Physica (Amsterdam) 224A, 348 (1996).
6. Q. Ouyang and J.-M. Flesselles, Nature (London) 379, 143 (1996).
7. M. Hawley, I. D. Raistrick, J. G. Beery, and R. J. Houlton, Science 251, 1587 (1991).
8. I. S. Aranson, A. R. Bishop, I. Daruka, and V. M. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1770 (1998).
9. M. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993).
10. I. S. Aranson and L. Kramer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 99 (2002).
11. J. Burguete, H. Chaté, F. Daviaud, and N. Mukolobwiez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3252 (1999).
12. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
13. P. S. Hagan, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 42, 762 (1982).
14. I. S. Aranson, L. Kramer, and A. Weber, Phys. Rev. E 47, 3231 (1993).
15. V. N. Biktashev, Nonlinear Waves II, edited by A. V. Gaponov-Grekhov and M. I. Rabinovich, Research Reports in Physics (Springer, Heidelberg, 1989).
16. L. M. Pismen and A. A. Nepomnyashchy, Phys. Rev. A 44, R2243 (1991).
17. I. S. Aranson L. Kramer, and A. Weber, Phys. Rev. E 48, R9 (1993).
18. A. J. Bray, Adv. Phys. 43, 357 (1994).
19. Extensive comparison with the CGLE is hampered by the fact that a long-enough run with reliable resolution takes about 1 month of CPU time on a fast workstation, even for c = 0.6-0.7. For smaller c, such simulation are practically impossible.
20. C. A. Angell, Science 267, 1924 (1995).
21. K. H. Fischer and J. A. Hertz, Spin Glasses (Cambridge University Press, London, 1991).
22. P. Coullet, L. Gil, and J. Lega, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1619 (1989).
23. Kosterlitz-Thouless-like transition in the noisy CGLE is discussed in I. S. Aranson, H. Chaté, and L.-H. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2646 (1998).