Time-lapse in vivo imaging of the morphological development of Xenopus optic tectal interneurons

Journal of Comparative Neurology

Volumn 459, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 392-406

  Wu, Gang Yi ^a   Cline, Hollis T ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor   (United States)

Author keywords

Dendrite; DiI; Structural plasticity

Indexed keywords

1,1' DIOCTADECYL 3,3,3',3' TETRAMETHYLINDOCARBOCYANINE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL MATURATION; CELL STRUCTURE; DENDRITE; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERNEURON; IONTOPHORESIS; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE PROJECTION; NONHUMAN; OPTIC TECTUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TADPOLE; XENOPUS;

ANIMALS; DENDRITES; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTERNEURONS; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 0037433774     PISSN: 00219967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cne.10618     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Antal M. 1991. Distribution of GABA immunoreactivity in the optic tectum of the frog: a light and electron microscopic study. Neuroscience 42: 879-891.
2. Antal M, Matsumoto N, Szekely G. 1986. Tectal neurons of the frog: intracellular recording and labeling with cobalt electrodes. J Comp Neurol 246:238-253.
3. Behan M, Kime NM. 1996. Intrinsic circuitry in the deep layers of the cat superior colliculus. Vis Neurosci 13:1031-1042.
4. Binns KE. 1999. The synaptic pharmacology underlying sensory processing in the superior colliculus. Prog Neurobiol 59:129-159.
5. Butt CM, Pauly JR, Debski EA. 2000. Distribution and development of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in the optic tectum of Rana pipiens. J Comp Neurol 423:603-618.
6. Butt CM, Pauly JR, Wilkins LH, Dwoskin LP, Debski EA. 2001. Pharmacology, distribution and development ofmuscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in the optic tectum of Rana pipiens. Neuroscience 104: 161-179.
7. Cline HT. 1996. Can there be growth without growth cones? Semin Neurosci 8:89-96.
8. Cline HT, Edwards JA, Rajan I, Wu GY, Zou DJ. 1999. In vivo imaging of CNS neuron development. In: Yuste R, Lanni F, Konnerth A, Yuste R, Lanni F, Konnerth AYuste R, Lanni F, Konnerth As, editors. Imaging: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. p 13.11-13.12.
9. Dye JC, Karten HJ. 1996. An in vitro study of retinotectal transmission in the chick: role of glutamate and GABA in evoked field potentials. Vis Neurosci 13:747-758.
10. Foa L, Rajan I, Haas K, Wu GY, Brakeman P, Worley P, Cline H. 2001. The scaffold protein, Homer1b/c, regulates axon pathfinding in the central nervous system in vivo. Nat Neurosci 4:499-506.
11. Ghosh A, Shatz CJ. 1993. A role for subplate neurons in the patterning of connections from thalamus to neocortex. Development 117:1031-1047.
12. Haas K, Sin W-C, Javaherian A, Li Z, Cline HT. 2001. Single-cell electroporation for in vivo neuronal gene expression. Neuron 29:1-9.
13. Hall JC. 1999. GABAergic inhibition shapes frequency tuning and modifies response properties in the auditory midbrain of the leopard frog. J Comp Physiol [A] 185:479-491.
14. Harris WA, Holt CE, Bonhoeffer F. 1987. Retinal axons with and without their somata, growing to and arborizing in the tectum of Xenopus embryos: a time-lapse video study of single fibres in vivo. Development 101:123-133.
15. Hensch TK, Fagiolini M, Mataga N, Stryker MP, Baekkeskov S, Kash SF. 1998. Local GABA circuit control of experience-dependent plasticity in developing visual cortex. Science 282:1504-1508.
16. Hilbig H, Roth G, Brylla E, Robine KP. 1998. Cytoarchitecture of the tectum opticum in the Japanese quail. Neuroscience 86:663-678.
17. Honig H, Hume RI. 1986. Fluorescent carbocyanine dyes allow living neurons of identified origin to be studied in long-term cultures. J Cell Biol 103:171-187.
18. Hughes TE. 1990. A light- and electron-microscopic investigation of the optic tectum of the frog, Rana pipiens. I. The retinal axons. Vis Neurosci 4:499-518.
19. Kuljis RO, Karten HJ. 1982. Laminar organization of peptide-like immunoreactivity in the anuran optic tectum. J Comp Neurol 212:188-201.
20. Lazar G, Szekely G. 1967. Golgi studies on the optic center of the frog. J Hirnforsch 9:329-344.
21. Lazar G, Toth P, Csank G, Kicliter E. 1983. Morphology and location of tectal projection neurons in frogs: a study with HRP and cobalt-filling. J Comp Neurol 215:108-120.
22. Li Z, Fite KV. 1998. Distribution of GABA-like immunoreactive neurons and fibers in the central visual nuclei and retina of frog, Rana pipiens. Vis Neurosci 15:995-1006.
23. Malayev AA, Debski EA. 1998. Serotonin modulates induced synaptic activity in the optic tectum of the frog. Brain Res 781:167-181.
24. Matsumoto N, Bando T. 1980. Excitatory synaptic potentials and morphological classification of tectal neurons of the frogs. Brain Res 192:39-48.
25. Matsumoto N, Schwippert WW, Ewert J-P. 1986. Intracellular activity of morphologically identified neurons of the grass frog's optic tectum in response to moving configurational visual stimuli. J Comp Physiol 159:721-739.
26. McBain CJ, Fisahn A. 2001. Interneurons unbound. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:11-23.
27. Meek J. 1981. A Golgi-electron microscopic study of goldfish optic tectum. I. Description of afferents, cell types, and synapses. J Comp Neurol 199:149-173.
28. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J. 1956. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.
29. O'Rourke NA, Fraser SE. 1990. Dynamic changes in optic fiber terminal arbors lead to retinotopic map formations: an in vivo confocal microscopic study. Neuron 5:159-171.
30. Pinard R, Benfares J, Lanoir J. 1991. Electron microscopic study of GABA-immunoreactive neuronal processes in the superficial gray layer of the rat superior colliculus: their relationships with degenerating retinal nerve endings. J Neurocytol 20:262-276.
31. Potter HD. 1969. Structural characteristics of cell and fiber populations in the optic tectum of the frog (Rana catesbeiana). J Comp Neurol 136: 203-232.
32. Romeskie M, Sharma SC. 1979. The goldfish optic tectum: a Golgi study. Neuroscience 4:625-642.
33. Roth G, Dicke U, Grunwald W. 1999. Morphology, axonal projection pattern, and response types of tectal neurons in plethodontid salamanders. II. Intracellular recording and labeling experiments. J Comp Neurol 404: 489-504.
34. Rybicka KK, Udin SB. 1994. Ultrastructure and GABA immunoreactivity in layers 8 and 9 of the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis. Eur J Neurosci 6:1567-1582.
35. Straznicky K, Gaze RM. 1972. The development of the tectum in Xenopus laevis: an autoradiographic study. J Embryol Exp Morphol 28:87-115.
36. Szekely G, Lazar G. 1976. Cellular and synaptic architectur of optic tectum. In: Llinas R, Precht W, Llinas R, Precht WLlinas R, Precht Ws, editors. Frog neurobiology. New York: Springer.
37. Titmus MJ, Tsai HJ, Lima R, Udin SB. 1999. Effects of choline and other nicotinic agonists on the tectum ofjuvenile and adult Xenopus frogs: a patch-clamp study. Neuroscience 91:753-769.
38. Wang SR, Matsumoto N. 1990. Postsynaptic potentials and morphology of tectal cells responding to electrical stimulation of the bullfrog nucleus isthmi. Vis Neurosci 5:479-488.
39. Witte S, Stier H, Cline HT. 1996. In vivo observations of timecourse and distribution of morphological dynamics in Xenopus retinotectal axon arbors. J Neurobiol 31:219-234.
40. Wu G-Y, Zou DJ, Rajan I, Cline HT. 1999. Dendritic dynamics in vivo change during neuronal maturation. J Neurosci 19:4472-4483.
41. Zhang H, Xu J, Feng AS. 1999. Effects of GABA-mediated inhibition on direction-dependent frequency tuning in the frog inferior colliculus. J Comp Physiol [A] 184:85-98.
42. Zhang LI, Tao HW, Poo M. 2000. Visual input induces long-term potentiation of developing retinotectal synapses. Nat Neurosci 3:708-715.
43. 2+/ calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in target tissue modifies presynaptic axon arbor growth. Neuron 16:529-539.
44. Zou D-J, Cline HT. 1999. Coordinated regulation of retinal axon and tectal cell growth by endogenous CaMKII in vivo. J Neurosci 19:8909-8918.