Mapping property distributions of molecular surfaces: Algorithm and evaluation of a novel 3D quantitative structure - Activity relationship technique

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1390-1407

  Stiefl, Nikolaus ^a   Baumann, Knut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

11BETA,17,21 TRIHYDROXY 2ALPHA METHYL 4 PREGNENE 3,20 DIONE; 16ALPHA METHYLPROGESTERONE; 16ALPHA,17 DIHYDROXY 4 PREGNENE 3,20 DIONE; 17 HYDROXYPREGNENOLONE; ALDOSTERONE; ANDROSTANOLONE; ANDROSTENEDIOL; ANDROSTENEDIONE; CORTICOSTEROID; CORTICOSTERONE; CORTISONE; CORTODOXONE; DEOXYCORTICOSTERONE; EPICORTICOSTERONE; ESTRADIOL; ESTRIOL; ESTRONE; HYDROCORTISONE; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE; HYDROXYPROGESTERONE; KETONE DERIVATIVE; MUSCARINIC M2 RECEPTOR AGONIST; NANDROLONE; PRASTERONE; PREDNISOLONE; PREGN 4 ENE 3,11,20 TRIONE; PREGNENOLONE; PROGESTERONE; TESTOSTERONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNINDEXED DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG STRUCTURE; EYE IRRITATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOXICITY TESTING;

ACETATES; ALCOHOLS; ALGORITHMS; CHOLINERGIC AGENTS; HYDROCARBONS, ACYCLIC; HYDROCARBONS, AROMATIC; KETONES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTOR, MUSCARINIC M2; RECEPTORS, MUSCARINIC; STEROIDS; TRANSCORTIN;

EID: 0037431388     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm021077w     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
2. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Pavan, M. Dragon. Software for the Calculation of Molecular Descriptors, version 1.11; http://www.disat.unimib.it/chm/Dragon.htm.
3. Adamson, G. W.; Lynch, M. F.; Town, W. G. Analysis of Structural Characteristics of Chemical Compounds in a Large Computer-Based File. Part 2. Atom Centred Fragments. Perkin Trans. 2 1970, 3702-3706.
4. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research; Academic Press: New York, 1976.
5. Carhart, R. E.; Smith, D. H.; Venkataraghavan, R. Atom Pairs as Molecular Features in Structure-Activity Studies: Definition and Applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
6. Baumann, K. An Alignment-Independent Versatile Structure Descriptor for QSAR and QSPR Based on the Distribution of Molecular Features. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 26-35.
7. Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
8. Klebe, G.; Abraham, U.; Mietzner, T. Molecular Similarity Indices in a Comparative Analysis (CoMSIA) of Drug Molecules To Correlate and Predict Their Biological Activity. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 4130-4146.
9. Doweyko, A. M. The Hypothetical Active Site Lattice. An approach to Modeling Active Sites from Data on Inhibitor Molecules. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 1396-1406.
10. Silverman, B. D.; Platt, D. E. Comparative Molecular Moment Analysis (CoMMA): 3D QSAR without Molecular Superposition. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2129-2140.
11. Ferguson, A. M.; Heritage, T.; Jonathon, P.; Pack, S. E.; Philips, L.; Rogan, J.; Snaith, P. J. EVA: A New Theoretically Based Molecular Descriptor for Use in QSAR/QSPR Analysis. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 143-152.
12. Todeschini, R.; Gramatica, P. 3D-Modelling and Prediction by WHIM Descriptors. Part 5. Theory Development and Chemical Meaning of WHIM Descriptors. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1997, 16, 113-119.
13. Gancia, E.; Bravi, G.; Mascagni, P.; Zaliani, A. Global 3D-QSAR Methods: MS-WHIM and Autocorrelation. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 293-306.
14. Schur, J. H.; Selzer, P.; Gasteiger, J. The Coding of the Three-Dimensional Structure of Molecules by Molecular Transforms and Ist Application to Structure - Spectra Correlations and Studies of Biological Activity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 334-344.
15. Pastor, M.; Cruciani, G.; McLay, I.; Pickett, S.; Clementi, S. Grid-Independent Descriptors (GRIND): A Novel Class of Alignment-Independent Three-Dimensional Molecular Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3233-3243.
16. Goodford, P. J. A Computational Procedure for Determining Energetically Favorable Binding Sites on Biologically Important Macromolecules. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 849-857.
17. Hopfinger, A. J.; Wang, S.; Tokarski, J. S.; Jin, B.; Albuquerque, M.; Madhav, P. J.; Duraiswami, C. Construction of 3D-QSAR Models Using the 4D-QSAR Analysis Formalism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10509-10524.
18. Coats, E. A. The CoMFA Steroids as a Benchmark Dataset for Development of 3D QSAR Methods. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1998, 12-14, 199-213.
19. Kulkarni, A.; Hopfinger, A. J.; Osborne, R.; Bruner, L. H.; Thompson, E. D. Prediction of Eye Irritation from Organic Chemicals Using Membrane-Interaction QSAR Analysis. Toxicol. Sci. 2001, 59, 335-345.
20. Tränkle, C.; Kostenis, E.; Burgmer, U.; Mohr, K. Search for Lead Structures To Develop New Allosteric Modulators of Muscarinic Receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 279, 926-933.
21. 2Receptors. Life Sci. 1998, 62, 423-429.
22. Mohr, K.; Holzgrabe, U. Allosteric Modulators of Ligand Binding to Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Drug Discovery Today 1998, 3, 214-222.
23. 2 Acetylcholine Receptors: Search for the Minimum Essential Distances between the Pharmacophoric Elements. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 849-858.
24. 2-Receptors. Life Sci. 2000, 66, 1675-1682.
25. 2-Receptor Allosterically. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2155-2164.
26. Pick, R. Allosterische Modulatoren des muscarinischen Acetylcholinrezeptors - Synthese Bis-Tertiärer Analoga des Leitmoleküls W84 (Allosteric modulators of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-Synthesis of bis-tertiary analogs of the lead structure W84). Dissertation, Universität Würzburg, Germany, 2000.
27. Sadowski, J.; Gasteiger, J. From Atoms and Bonds to ThreeDimensional Atomic Coordinates: Automatic Model Builders. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2567-2581.
28. Alchemy 2000, version 2.05; Tripos Inc. (1699 South Hanley Rd): St. Louis, MO 63144, 1998.
29. Connolly, M. L.; Analytical Molecular Surface Calculation. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1983, 16, 548-558.
30. Christopher, J. A. Computer-assisted modelling and analysis of biomolecular structures. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 1998.
31. Sanner, M. F.; Spehner, J.-C.; Olson, A. J. Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 1996, 38, 305-320.
32. Pascual-Ahuir, J. L.; Silla, E. GEPOL: An Improved Description of Molecular Surfaces. I. Building the Spherical Surface Set. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 1047-1060.
33. Rohrbough, R. H.; Jurs, P. C. Molecular Shape and the Prediction of High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Retention Indexes of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Anal. Chem. 1985, 59, 1048-1054.
34. Rocchia, W.; Sridharan, S.; Nicholls, A.; Alexov, E.; Chiabrera, A.; Honig, B. Rapid grid-based construction of the molecular surface and the use of induced surface charge to calculate reaction field energies: applications to the molecular systems and geometric objects. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 128-137.
35. Howard, J. A. K.; Hoy, V. J.; O'Hagan, D.; Smith, G. T. How Good Is Fluorine as a Hydrogen Bond Acceptor? Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 12613-12622.
36. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J. Prediction of Hydrophobic (Lipophilic) Properties of Small Organic Molecules Using Fragmental Methods: An Analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP Methods. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772.
37. Heiden, W.; Moeckel, G.; Brickmann, J. A New Approach to Analysis and Display of Local Lipophilicity/Hydrophilicity Mapped on Molecular Surfaces. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7, 503-514
38. Sheridan, R. P.; Miller, M. D.; Underwood, D. J.; Kearsley, S. K. Chemical Similarity Using Geometric Atom Pair Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 128-136.
39. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of Structure - Activity Data To Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
40. McGregor, M. J.; Muskal, S. M. Pharmacophore Fingerprinting. 1. Application to QSAR and Focused Library Design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 569-574.
41. Davis, A. M.; Teague, S. J. Hydrogen Bonding, Hydrophobic Interactions, and Failure of the Rigid Receptor Hyothesis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 736-749.
42. Soltzberg, L. J.; Wilkins, C. L. Molecular transforms: a potential tool for structure - activity studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 439-443.
43. Zupan, J.; Novic, M. General type of a uniform and reversible representation of chemical structures. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 348 409-418.
44. Baumann, K. Uniform-length molecular descriptors for quantitative structure-property (QSPR), quantitative structure - activity (QSAR), classification studies and similarity searching. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 1999, 18, 36-46.
45. Mason, J. S.; Good, A. C.; Martin, E. J. 3-D Pharmacophores in Drug Discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2001, 7, 567-597.
46. Moreau, G.; Broto, P. The Autocorrelation of a Topological Structure: A New Molecular Descriptor. Nouv. J. Chim. 1980, 4, 357-358.
47. Broto, P.; Moreau, G.; Vandyke, C. Molecular Structures: Perception, Autocorrelation Descriptor and SAR Studies - Perception of Molecules: Topological Structure and 3-Dimensional Structure. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 19, 61-65.
48. Martens, H.; Naes, T. Multivariate Calibration; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K., 1989.
49. Osten, D. W. Selection of optimal regression models via crossvalidation. J. Chemom. 1988, 2, 39-48.
50. Glover, F. Tabu Search - Part I. ORSA J. Comput. 1989, 1, 190-206.
51. Glover, F. Tabu Search - Part II. ORSA J. Comput. 1990, 2, 4-32.
52. Voss, S. Intelligent Search (Habilitationsschrift); Technische Hochschule Darmstadt: Germany, 1993.
53. Baumann, K.; Albert, H.; von Korff, M. A Systematic Evaluation of the Benefits and Hazards of Variable Selection in Latent Variable Regression. Part I: Search Algorithm, Theory and Simulations. J. Chemom. 2002, 16, 339-350.
54. Shao, J. Linear Model Selection by Cross-Validation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1993, 88, 486-494.
55. Zhang, P. Model Selection via Multifold Cross Validation. Ann. Stat. 1993, 21, 299-313.
56. Cruciani, G.; Baroni, M.; Clementi, S.; Costantino, G.; Riganelli, D.; Skagerberg, B. Predictive Ability of Regression Models. Part I: Standard Deviation of Prediction Errors (SDEP). J. Chemom. 1992, 6, 335-346.
57. Baroni, M.; Costatino, G.; Cruciani, G.; Riganelli, D.; Valigi, R.; Clementi, S. Gnerating Optimal Linear PLS Estimations (GOLPE): An Advanced Chemometric Tool for Handling 3D-QSAR Problems. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1993, 12, 9-20.
58. Cruciani, G.; Clementi, S. GOLPE: Philosophy and Applications in 3D QSAR. In Advanced Computer Assisted Techniques in Drug Discovery; van de Waterbeemd, H., Ed.; VCH Weinheim: Weinheim, Germany, 1994; pp 61-89.
59. Geisser, S. The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1975, 70, 320-328.
60. Baumann, K.; von Korff, M.; Albert, H. A Systematic Evaluation of the Benefits and Hazards of Variable Selection in Latent Variable Regression. Part II: Practical Applications. J. Chemom. 2002, 16, 351-360.
61. Burman, P. A Comparative Study of Ordinary Cross-Validation, v-fold Cross-Validation and the Repeated Learning - Testing Methods. Biometrika 1989, 76, 503-514.
62. Topliss, J. G.; Edwards, R. P. Chance Factors in Studies of Quantitative Structure - Activity Relationships. J. Med. Chem. 1979, 22, 1238-1244.
63. Klopman, G.; Kalos, A. N. Causality in Structure - Activity Studies. J. Comput. Chem. 1985, 6, 492-506.
64. Baumann, K. Distance profiles (DiP): A translationally and rotationally invariant 3D structure descriptor capturing steric properties of molecules. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 2002, 21, 507-519.
65. Wu, W.; Walczak, B.; Massart, D. L.; Heuerding, S.; Erni, F.; Last, I. R.; Prebble, K. A. Artifical neural networks in classification of NIR spectral data: Design of the training set. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1996, 33, 35-46.
66. Kennard, R. W.; Stone, L. A. Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 1969, 11, 137-148.
67. Roecker, E. B. Prediction-error and its estimation for subsetselected models. Technometrics 1991, 33, 459-468.
68. Draize, J. H.; Woodard, G.; Calvery, H. O. Methods for the Study of Irritation and Toxicity of Substances Applied to the skin and Mucous Membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1944, 82, 377-390.
69. Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals; No. 405; OECD: Paris, 1987.
70. McKarns, S. C.; Hansch, C.; Caldwell, W. S.; Morgan, W. T.; Moore, S. K.; Doolittle, D. J. Correlation between Hydrophobicity of Short-Chain Aliphatic Alcohols and Their Ability To Alter Plasma Membrane Integrity. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1997, 36, 62-70.
71. Holzgrabe, U.; Wagener, M.; Gasteiger, J. Comparison of Structurally Different Allosteric Modulators of Muscarinic Receptors by Self-Organizing Neural Networks. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 185-193.
72. DAYLIGHT Programmer's Toolkit; Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc. (#360 Mission Viejo): Los Altos, CA 92691, 2000.
73. UNITY, version 4.2.1; Tripos Inc. (1699 South Hanley Rd): St. Louis, MO 63144, 2000.
74. SYBYL, version 6.7.1; Tripos Inc. (1699 South Hanley Rd): St. Louis, MO 63144, 2000.