Monte Carlo evaluation of non-abelian statistics

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Tserkovnyak, Yaroslav ^a   Simon, Steven H ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FERMIONS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; HOLE TRAPS; INTEGRATION; INTERPOLATION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MONTE CARLO METHODS; STATISTICS;

CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES; MOORE-READ STATE; NON-ABELIAN STATISTICS; QUANTUM HALL SYSTEMS; QUANTUM STATISTICS; QUASIHOLES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0037428604     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1583 (1984).
2. D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 722 (1984).
3. G. Moore and N. Read, Nucl. Phys. B360, 362 (1991).
4. N. Read, Physica (Amsterdam) 298B, 121 (2001).
5. N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8084 (1999)
6. N. R. Cooper, N. K. Wilkin, and J. M. F. Gunn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 120405 (2001)
7. D. A. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001).
8. M. H. Freedman, A. Kitaev, M. J. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 40, 31 (2003).
9. F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2111 (1984).
10. F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 605 (1983).
11. 2 = DetΛ, the matrix determinant. The sign of the square root can be obtained by enforcing appropriate linear relations for the overcomplete basis of Pfaffian wave functions [10].
12. C. Nayak and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B479, 529 (1996).
13. M. Greiter, X.-G. Wen, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3205 (1991).
14. N. Read and D. Green, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10 267 (2000).
15. A. Wójs, Phys. Rev. B 63, 125312 (2001), where it was suggested , based on numerical diagonalization, that the MR state be understood as a Laughlin bosonic state of paired (bare) electrons.
16. N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 54, 16 864 (1996).
17. N. Read and G. Moore, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 107, 157 (1992).
18. V. Gurarie and C. Nayak, Nucl. Phys. B506, 685 (1997).