Comparison of finite difference and finite element solutions to the variably saturated flow equation

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 270, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 49-64

  Simpson, M J ^a   Clement, T P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Finite difference; Finite element; Groundwater; Numerical solution; Unsaturated flow; Variably saturated flow

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; NUMERICAL METHODS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

SATURATED FLOW EQUATION;

HYDROLOGY;

FINITE DIFFERENCE TECHNIQUE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUNDWATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; SATURATED MEDIUM;

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHREATIC ZONE;

EID: 0037428022     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00294-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Boufadel, M.C., Suidan, M.T., Venosa, A.D., 1999. Numerical modeling of water flow below dry salt lakes: effect of capillarity and viscosity. Journal of Hydrology 221, 55-74.
2. Celia, M.A., Bouloutas, E.T., Zarba, R.L., 1990. A general mass-conservative numerical solution of the unsaturated flow equation. Water Resources Research 26, 1483-1496.
3. Clement, T.P., Wise, W.R., Molz, F.J., 1994. A physically based, two-dimensional, finite-difference algorithm for modeling variably saturated flow. Journal of Hydrology 161, 71-90.
4. Cooley, R.L., 1983. Some new procedures for numerical solution of variably saturated flow problems. Water Resources Research 19 (5), 1271-1285.
5. Cooley, R.L., 1992. A modular finite-element model (MODFE) for areal and axisymmetric ground-water flow problems, Part 2: derivation of finite-element equations and comparisons with analytical solutions. US Geological Survey, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A4.
6. Eisenberg, M.A., Malvern, L.E., 1973. On finite element integration in natural coordinates. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 7, 574-575.
7. Gray, W.G., 1984. Comparison of Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods. In: Bear, J., Coropcioglu, M.Y. (Eds.), Fundamentals of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media, NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 899-952.
8. Haverkamp, R., Vauclin, M., 1981. A comparative study of three forms of the Richard equation used for predicting one-dimensional infiltration in unsaturated soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 45, 13-20.
9. Hayhoe, H.N., 1978. Study of the relative efficiency of finite difference and Galerkin techniques for modeling soil-water transfer. Water Resources Research 14 (1), 97-102.
10. Istok, J., 1989. Groundwater Modelling by the Finite Element Method, American Geophysical Union, Washington.
11. Mualem, Y., 1976. A new model for predicting hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research 12, 513-522.
12. Neuman, S.P., 1973. Saturated-unsaturated seepage by finite elements. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 99, 2233-2250.
13. Neuman, S.P., Feddes, R.A., Bresler, E., 1975. Finite element analysis of two-dimensional flow in soils considering water uptake by roots: 1 theory. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 39, 224-230.
14. Pinder, G.F., Gray, W.G., 1976. Is there a difference in the finite element method? Water Resources Research 12 (1), 105-107.
15. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran, The Art of Scientific Computing, second ed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Segerlind, L.J., 1984. Applied Finite Element Analysis, second ed, Wiley, New York.
17. Segol, G., 1976. A three-dimensional Galerkin-finite element model for the analysis of contaminant transport in saturated-unsaturated porous media. Finite Elements in Water Resources, 2.123-2.144.
18. Simpson, M.J., 2002. An analysis of unconfined groundwater flow characteristics about a seepage-face boundary. Draft PhD Thesis, Centre for Water Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
19. Van Genuchten, M.Th., 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892-898.
20. Van Genuchten, M.Th., 1982. A comparison of numerical solutions of the one-dimensional unsaturated-saturated flow and mass transport equations. Advances in Water Resources 5 (1). 46-55.
21. Vauclin, M., Khanji, D., Vauchaud, G., 1979. Experimental and numerical study of a transient two-dimensional unsaturated-saturated water table recharge problem. Water Resources Research 15 (5), 1089-1101.
22. Wang, H.F., Anderson, M.P., 1982. Introduction to Groundwater Modeling: Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods, Freeman, San Francisco.
23. Warrick, A.W., Biggar, J.W., Neilsen, D.R., 1971. Simultaneous solute and water transfer for an unsaturated soil. Water Resources Research 7 (5), 1216-1225.
24. Zheng, C., Bennett, G.D., 1995. Applied Contaminant Transport Modeling: Theory and Practice, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
25. Zienkiewicz, O.C., Cheung, Y.K., 1965. Finite elements in the solution of field problems. The Engineer, 507-510.