Multiresolution analysis in statistical mechanics. II. The wavelet transform as a basis for Monte Carlo simulations in lattices

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 118, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 4424-4431

  Ismail, Ahmed E ^a   Stephanopoulos, George ^a   Rutledge, Gregory C ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTAL LATTICES; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); HAMILTONIANS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; ONE DIMENSIONAL; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; TEMPERATURE; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

ISING LATTICE; MULTIRESOLUTION ANALYSIS; WAVELET ACCELERATED MONTE CARLO ALGORITHM;

STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

EID: 0037426176     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1543582     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. 159, 98 (1967).
2. P. P. Ewald, Ann. Phys. 64, 253 (1921).
3. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications (Academic, San Diego, 1996).
4. S.-K. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 461 (1976).
5. R. H. Swendsen; Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 859 (1979).
6. S. Curtarolo and G. Ceder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 255504 (2002).
7. J. Cho and W. L. Mattice, Macromolecules 30, 637 (1997).
8. J. Cho and W. L. Mattice, Macromolecules 30, 5520 (1997).
9. A. G. Schlijper, P. J. Hoogerbrugge, and C. W. Manke, J. Rheol. 39, 567 (1995).
10. W. Tschöp, K. Kremer, J. Batoulis, T. Bürger, and O. Hahn, Acta Polym. 49, 61 (1998).
11. W. Tschöp, K. Kremer, O. Hahn, J. Batoulis, and T. Bürger, Acta Polym. 49, 75 (1998).
12. A. E. Ismail, G. C. Rutledge, and G. Stephanopoulos, J. Chem. Phys. 1189, 4414 (2003) (preceding paper).
13. C. Best, A. Schäfer, and W. Greiner, Nucl. Phys. B. Proc. Suppl. 34, 780, (1994).
14. C. Best and A. Schäfer, Variational Description of Statistical Field Theories Using Daubechies' Wavelets, http://xx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-lat/9402012. 1994.
15. D.-W. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3961 (1997).
16. R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86 (1987).
17. U. Wolff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 361 (1989).
18. W. Sweldens, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Math. Anal. 29, 511 (1997).
19. S. G. Mallat, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mech. Intell. 11, 674 (1989).
20. S. G. Mallat, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 315, 69 (1989).
21. I. Daubechies and W. Sweldens, Journal of Fourier Analysis and Its Applications 4, 247 (1998).
22. J. Q. Broughton, F. F. Abraham, N. Bernstein, and E. Kaxiras, Phys. Rev. B 60, 2391 (1999).
23. R. M. Nieminen, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 2859 (2002).
24. T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, and R. I. Rivest, Introduction to Algorithms (McGraw-Hill-MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990).
25. P. Billingsley, Probability and Measure (Wiely-Interscience, New York, 1995).
26. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
27. R. K. Pathria, Statistical Mechanics (Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, 1996).
28. J. J. Binney, N. J. Dowrick, A. J. Fisher, and M. E. J. Newman, The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization Group (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993).
29. H. Flyvbjerg and H. G. Petersen, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 461 (1989).
30. J. Baschnagel, K. Binder, P. Doruker et al., Adv. Polym. Sci. 152, 41 (2000).
31. R. L. C. Akkermans and W. J. Briels, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 1020 (2001).
32. K. J. Wilson and J. Kogut, Phys. Rep. 12, 75 (1974).
33. A. P. Lyubartsev and A. Laaksonen, Phys. Rev. E 52, 3730 (1995).
34. A. P. Lyubartsev and A. Laaksonen, Phys. Rev. E 55, 5689 (1997).
35. G. C. Rutledge, Phys. Rev. E 63 021111 (2001).
36. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).