Noninnocence of the ligand glyoxal-bis(2-mercaptoanil). The electronic structures of [Fe(gma)]2, [Fe(gma)(py)]·py, [Fe(gma)(CN)]1-/0, [Fe(gma)I], and [Fe(gma)(PR3)n] (n = 1, 2). Experimental and theoretical evidence for "excited state" coordination

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1293-1308

  Ghosh, Prasanta ^a   Bill, Eckhard ^a   Weyhermüller, Thomas ^a   Neese, Frank ^a   Wieghardt, Karl ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL ENERGY CONVERSION   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RADICAL TRIANION;

CYANIDES; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; IODINE; MOSSBAUER SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

IRON COMPOUNDS;

GLYOXAL BIS(2 MERCAPTOANIL); GLYOXAL DERIVATIVE; IRON COMPLEX; LIGAND; PHOSPHINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOSSBAUER SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EID: 0037419799     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja021123h     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Jadamus, H.; Fernando, Q.; Freiser, H. Inorg. Chem. 1964, 3, 928.
2. (a) Stiefel, E. I.; Waters, J. H.; Billig, E.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3016.
3. (b) Lalor, F.; Hawthorne, M. F.; Maki, A. H.; Darlington, K.; Davison, A.; Gray, H. B.; Dori, Z.; Stiefel, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89. 2278.
4. (c) Holm, R. H.; Balch, A. L.; Davison, A.; Maki, A. H.; Berry, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 2866.
5. (d) Maki, A. H.; Berry, T. E.; Davison, A.; Holm, R. H.; Balch, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 1080.
6. (e) Dori, Z.; Eisenberg, R.; Stiefel, E. I.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 1506.
7. Bayer, E.; Breitmaier, E. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101, 1579.
8. Corbin, J. L.; Work, D. E. Can. J. Chem. 1974, 52, 1054.
9. Elder, M. S.; Prinz, G. M.; Thornton, P.; Busch, D. H. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 2426.
10. Sellmann, D.; Hannakam, M.; Knoch, F.; Moll, M. Z Naturforsch. 1992, 47b, 1545.
11. Karsten, P.; Maichle-Mössner, C.; Strähle, J. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1997, 623, 1644.
12. ShelXTL V.5, Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments, Inc., 1994.
13. Neese, F.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 6568.
14. (a) Neese, F.; J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 11080.
15. (b) Neese, F. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2001, 83, 104.
16. F. Neese, J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 4290.
17. Neese, F. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 337, 181.
18. (a) Munzarova, M L.; Kaupp, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 9966.
19. (b) Munzarova, M. L.; Kubacek, P.; Kaupp, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11900.
20. (a) Schreckenbach, G.; Ziegler, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 3388.
21. (b) Malkina, O. L.; Vaara, J.; Schimmelpfenning, B.; Munzarova, M.; Malkin, V.; Kaupp, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9206.
22. (c) Kaupp, M.; Reviakine, R.; Malkina, O. L.; Arbuznikov, A.; Schimmelpfennig, B.; Malkin, V. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 23, 794.
23. (d) Patchkovskii, S.; Ziegler, T. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105, 5490.
24. (a) Van Lenthe, E.; Wormer, P. E. S.; van der Avoird, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 2488.
25. (b) Van Lenthe, E.; van der Avoird, A.; Wormer, P. E. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 4783.
26. (a) Neese, F.; Solomon, E. I. Magnetoscience - From Molecules to Materials: Miller, J. S., Drillon, M., Eds.; Wiley: New York, in press.
27. (b) Kaupp, M. In: Lund, A., Shiotani, M., Eds. EPR Spectroscopy of Free Radicals in Solids. Trends in Methods and Applications: Kluwer: Dordrecht.
28. Koch, W.; Holthausen, M. C. A Chemist's guide to Density Functional Theory; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000.
29. Neese, F. ORCA - an ab initio. DFT. and Semiempirical Electronic Structure Package. Version 2.2, Revision 14, Max-Planck Institut für Strahlenchemie, Mülheim, Germany, May 2002.
30. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 84, 4524.
31. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822.
32. (a) Schäfer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571.
33. (b) Schäfer, A.; Huber C.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1994. 100, 5829.
34. Basis sets were obtained from the ftp server of the quantum chemistry group at the university of Karlsruhe (Germany) under http://www.chemie.uni-karlsruhe.de/PC/TheoChem/.
35. (a) Pulay, P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980. 73, 393.
36. (b) Pulay, P. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 3, 556.
37. (a) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
38. (b) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
39. Dufek, P.; Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 3545.
40. (a) Wachter, A. J. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 1033.
41. (b) Hay, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 66, 4377.
42. Pipek, J.; Mezey, P. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 4916.
43. Laaksonen, L. The gOpenMol effort, Version 1.4, Espoo, Finland, 2000, obtained from http://www.csc.fi/∼laaksone/gopenmol/gopenmol.html.
44. (a) Amos, A. T.; Hall, G. G. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. A 1961, 263, 483.
45. (b) King, H. F.; Stanton, R. E.; Kim, H.; Wyatt, R. E.; Parr, R. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 47, 1936.
46. B at 298 K).
47. (a) Medhi, O. K.; Silver, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 1199.
48. (b) Dale, B. W.; Williams, R. J. P.; Edwards, P. R.; Johnson, C. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 3445.
49. (c) Labarta, A.; Molins, E.; Vinas, X.; Tejada, J.; Caubet, A.; Alvarez, S. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 444.
50. Sellmann, D.; Kleine-Kleffmann, U.; Zapf, L.; Huttner, G.; Zsolnai, L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 263, 321. Sellmann, D.; Emig, S:; Heinemann, F. W.; Knoch, F. Angew. Chem. 1997. 109, 1250.
51. Sellmann, D.; Kleine-Kleffmann, U.; Zapf, L.; Huttner, G.; Zsolnai, L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 263, 321. Sellmann, D.; Emig, S:; Heinemann, F. W.; Knoch, F. Angew. Chem. 1997. 109, 1250.
52. Sellmann, D.; Emig, S.; Heinemann, F. W.; Knoch, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1201.
53. Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10012.
54. Ghosh, P.; Wieghardt, K., unpublished results.
55. Sellmann, D.; Ruf, R.; Knoch, F.; Moll, M. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 4745.
56. Nicarchos, D.; Kostikas, A.; Simopoulos, A.; Coucouvanis, D.; Piltingsrud, D.; Coffman, R. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69, 444.
57. Keutel, H.; Käpplinger, I.; Jäger, E.-G.; Grodzicki, M.; Schünemann, V.; Trautwein, A. X. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 2320.
58. Gardiner, M. G.; Hanson, G. R.; Henderson, M. J.; Lee, F. C.; Raston, C. L. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 2456.
59. Szabo, A.; Ostlund, N. S. Modern Theoretical Chemistry; MacMillan Pub. Inc.: New York, 1982.
60. (a) Petersilka, M.; Gossmann, U. J.; Gross, E. K. U. Phys. Rev. Lett, 1996, 76, 1212.
61. (b) Petersilka, M.; Gross, E. K. U. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1996. 30, 181.
62. (c) Görling, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 54, 3912.
63. Note that orbital energy differences are more meaningful in DFT calculations that do not incorporate the Hartree-Fock exchange compared to those calculated with hybrid functionals or the Hartree-Fock method. In HF calculations the virtual orbitals "see" and N electron system instead of a N - 1 electron system as it should be. Therefore all of these orbitals are too high in energy and are too diffuse. To the extent that HF exchange is incorporated into hybrid DFT, this shortcoming is "inherited" from HF in these functionals. There are no observables that can be meaningfully related to the orbital energy differences in either case. By contrast, for "pure" functionals the virtual orbitals are appropriate and the orbital energy differences are well-defined zero-order approximations for excitation energies.
64. (a) Noodleman, L. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 5737.
65. (b) Noodleman L.; Davidson, E. R. Chem. Phys. 1986, 109, 131.
66. (a) Yamaguchi, K.; Takahara, Y.; Fueno, T. In: Applied Quantum Chemistry; Smith, V. H., Eds.; Reidel: Dordrecht. 1986; p 155.
67. (b) Soda, T.; Kitagawa, Y.; Onishi, T.; Takano, Y.; Shigeta, Y.; Nagao, H.; Yoshioka, Y.; Yamaguchi, K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 319, 223.
68. Shadle, S. E.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2259.
69. Li, M.; Bonnet, D.; Bill, E.; Neese, F.; Weyhermüller, T.; Blum, N.; Sellmann, D.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3444-3456.
70. The shapes of the MO's in Figure 11 do not resemble the textbook-like d-orbitals well. This is a result of the localization procedure used to "separate" the metal from the ligand orbitals. The canonical orbitals are very strongly mixed and are not illuminating in indicating the electronic configuration of the iron. The resulting description we develop here is nevertheless valid.
71. Sellmann, D.; Geck, M.; Knoch, F.; Ritter, G.; Denger, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3819.
72. Bencini, A.; Gatteschi, D. EPR of Exchange Coupled Systems; Springer: Heidelberg; 1990.
73. Kostka, K. L.; Fox, B. G.; Hendrich, M. P.; Collins, T. J.; Rickard, C. E. F.; Wright, L. J.; Münck, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6746.
74. (a) Noodleman, L.; Baerends, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2316.
75. (b) Le Pape, L.; Lamotte, B.; Mouesca, J. M.; Riu, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9757.
76. Bachler, V.; Olbrich, G.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 4179.
77. (a) Coppens, P.; Novozhilova, I.; Kovalevsky, A. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 861.
78. (b) Kim, C. D.; Pillet, S.; Wu, G.; Fullgar, W. K.; Coppens, P. Acta Crystallogr. A 2002, 58, 133.
79. (c) Hicks, C.; Ye, G. Z.; Levi, C.; Gonzales, M.; Rutenburg, I.; Fan, J. W.; Helmy, R.; Kassis, A.; Gafney, H. D. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 211, 207.