Using clinical databases in practice

British Medical Journal

Volumn 326, Issue 7379, 2003, Pages 2-3

  Black, Nick ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURVIVAL; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA BASE; EDITORIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 0037417605     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7379.2     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Black NA. High-quality clinical databases: breaking down barriers. Lancet 1999;353:1205-6.
2. Lundin J, Lundin M, Isola J, Joensuu H. A web-based system for individualised survival estimation in breast cancer. BMJ 2003;326:29.
3. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 1997;2:112-21.
4. Department of Health. Learning from Bristol: the report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. London: Stationery Office, 2001.
5. Entwistle VA, Sowden AJ, Watt IS. Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged? J Health Serv Res Policy 1998;3:100-7.
6. Estabrooks C, Goel V, Thiel E, Pinfold P, Sawka C, Williams I. Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2001;6:170-82.
7. Black N, Payne M. Improving the use of clinical databases. BMJ 2002;324:1194.