|
|
Volumn 361, Issue 9351, 2003, Pages 77-79
|
|
Primary angioplasty or thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction? [7] (multiple letters)
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
PLACEBO;
ACUTE HEART INFARCTION;
ANGIOPLASTY;
ATHEROSCLEROSIS;
BALLOON;
BLOOD CLOT LYSIS;
BYPASS SURGERY;
CLINICAL FEATURE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
FATALITY;
FIBRINOLYSIS;
FOLLOW UP;
HEART INFARCTION;
HEART INJURY;
HEART LEFT VENTRICLE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
ISCHEMIA;
LABORATORY;
LETTER;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
MORTALITY;
PATIENT CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REPERFUSION;
RISK;
STENOSIS;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SURVIVAL;
TIME;
TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY;
NOTE;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY;
HUMANS;
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION;
THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;
TIME FACTORS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
|
|
EID: 0037417536
PISSN: 01406736
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12135-6 Document Type: Letter |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (5)
|
