Quasi-regression with shrinkage

Mathematics and Computers in Simulation

Volumn 62, Issue 3-6, 2003, Pages 231-241

  Jiang, Tao ^a   Owen, Art B ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer experiments; Global sensitivity analysis; Machine learning; Wavelets

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

BLACK BOX FUNCTIONS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037417060     PISSN: 03784754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4754(02)00253-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. An J., Owen A.B., Quasi-regression. J. Comp. 17(4):2001;588-607.
2. Owen A.B., Assessing linearity in high dimensions. Ann. Stat. 28(1):2000;1-19.
3. C. LeMieux, A.B. Owen, Quasi-regression and the relative importance of the ANOVA components of a function, in: K.T. Fang, F.J. Hickernell, H. Niederreiter (Eds.), Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002, pp. 331-344.
4. Chui C.K., Diamond H., A natural formulation of quasi-interpolation by multivariate splines. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 99(4):1987;643-646.
5. Donoho D.L., Johnstone I.M., Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika. 81:1994;425-455.
6. S. Efromovich, On orthogonal series estimators for random design nonparametric regression, in: Proceedings of the 24rd Symposium on the Interface, Computing Science and Statistics, 1992, pp. 375-379.
7. A.B. Owen, A central limit theorem for Latin hypercube sampling, J. R. Stat. Soc., B 54 (1992) 541-551.
8. J. Koehler, A. Owen, Computer experiments, in: S. Ghosh, C. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Design and Analysis of Experiments, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 261-308.
9. Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., Wynn H.P., Design and analysis of computer experiments (c/r: P423-435). Stat. Sci. 4:1989;409-423.
10. Currin C., Mitchell T., Morris M., Ylvisaker D., Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with applications to the design and analysis of computer experiments. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 86:1991;953-963.
11. K. Ritter, Average case analysis of numerical problems, Ph.D. thesis, University of Erlangen, 1995.
12. A. Saltelli, K. Chan, E.M. Scott, Sensitivity Analysis, Wiley, Chichester, 2000.
13. Sobol I.M., Sensitivity estimates for non-linear mathematical models. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie. 2:1990;112-118. in Russian.
14. Sobol I.M., Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math. Model. Comput. Exp. 1:1993;407-414.
15. Archer G.E.B., Saltelli A., Sobol I.M., Sensitivity measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the use of bootstrap. J. Stat. Comput. Simulat. 58:1997;99-120.
16. Sobol I.M., Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math. Comput. Simulat. 55:2001;271-280.
17. A.B. Owen, The dimension distribution and quadrature test functions, Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, 2001.
18. V.N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995.
19. R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, D.G. Stork, Pattern Classification, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 2000.
20. T.J. Hastie, R.J. Tibshirani, J.H. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001.
21. W. Venables, B. Ripley, Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus, 3rd ed., Springer, New York, 1999.
22. Ein-Dor P., Feldmesser J., Attributes of the performance of central processing units: a relative performance prediction model. Commun. ACM. 30:1987;308-317.