Synaptic depression in the localization of sound

Nature

Volumn 421, Issue 6918, 2003, Pages 66-70

  Cook, Daniel L ^a   Schwindt, Peter C ^a   Grande, Lucinda A ^b   Spain, William J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b VA PUGET SOUND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; NEURAL NETWORKS; PLASTICITY;

SYNAPTIC DEPRESSIONS;

NEUROLOGY;

SOUND PROPAGATION;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; BIOPHYSICS; BRAIN STEM; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CHICKEN; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE FUNCTION; NONHUMAN; PLASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOUND DETECTION; SYNAPSE; THALAMUS INTRALAMINAR NUCLEUS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN STEM; CHICK EMBRYO; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEURONS; SOUND; SPACE PERCEPTION; SYNAPSES; TIME FACTORS;

ANIMALIA; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 0037413608     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01248     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Tsodyks M., Pawelzik, K. & Markram, H. Neural network with dynamic synapses. Nueral Comput. 10, 821-835 (1998).
2. Abbott, L. F., Varela, J. A., Sen, K. & Nelson, S. B. Synaptic depression and corticol gain control. Science 275, 220-224 (1997).
3. Dobrunz, L. E. & Stevens, C. F. Heterogeneity of release probability, facilitation, and depletion at central synapses. Neuron 18, 995-1008 (1997).
4. Nadim, E, Manor, Y., Kopell, N. & Marder, E. Synaptic depression creates a switch that controls the frequency of an oscillatory circuit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8206-8211 (1999).
5. Parks, T. N. & Rubel, E. W. Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: organization of projections from n. magnocellularis to n. laminaris. J. Comp. Neurol. 164, 435-448 (1975).
6. Goldberg, J. M. & Brown, P. B. Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J. Neurophysiol. 32, 613-636 (1969).
7. Yin, T. C. & Chan, J. C. Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat. J. Neurophysiol. 64, 465-488 (1990).
8. Carr, C. E. & Konishi, M. A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl. J. Neurosci. 10, 3227-3246 (1990).
9. Zhou, N. & Parks, T. N. Pharmacology of excitatory amino acid neurotransmission in nucleus laminaris of the chick. Hear. Res 52, 195-200 (1991).
10. Warchol, M. E. & Dallos, P. Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 166, 721-734 (1990).
11. Pena, J. L., Viete, S., Albeck, Y. & Konishi, M. Tolerance to sound intensity of binaural coincidence detection in the nucleus laminaris of the owl. J. Neurosci. 16, 7046-7054 (1996).
12. Reyes, A. D., Rubel, E. W. & Spain, W. J. In vitro analysis of optimal stimuli for phase-locking and time-delayed modulation of firing in avian nucleus laminaris neurons. J. Neurosci. 16, 993-1007 (1996).
13. Funabiki, K., Koyano, K. & Ohmori, H. The role ofGABAergic inputs for coincidence detection in the neurones of nucleus laminaris of the chick. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 508, 851-869 (1998).
14. Bruckner, S. & Hyscon, R. L. Effect of GABA on the processing ofinteraural time differences in nucleus laminaris neurons in the chick. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 3438-3450 (1998).
15. Yang, L., Monsivais, P. & Rubel, E. W. The superior olivary nucleus and its influence on nucleus laminaris: a source of inhibitory feedback for coincidence detection in the avian auditory brainstem. J. Neurosci. 19, 2313-2325 (1999).
16. Agmon-Snir, H., Carr, C. E. & Rinzel, J. The role of dendrites in auditory coincidence detection. Nature 393, 268-272 (1998).
17. Jackson, H. & Rubel, E. W. Ontogeny of behavioral responsiveness to sound in the chick embryo as indicated by electrical recordings of motility. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 92, 682-696 (1978).
18. Hines, M. L. & Carnevale, N. T. The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comp. 9, 1179-1209 (1997).
19. Koppl, C. Phase locking to high frequencies in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl, Tyto alba. J. Neurosci. 17, 3312-3321 (1997).
20. Lilly, A. W. & North, K. A. K. An electrical investigation effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian neuromuscular junction. J. Neurophysiol. 16, 509-527 (1953).
21. Tsodyks, M. V. & Markram, H. The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 719-723 (1997).
22. Brenowitz, S. & Trussell, L. O. Maturation of synaptic transmission at end-bulb synapses of the cochlear nucleus. J. Neurosci. 21, 9487-9498 (2001).
23. Dobrunz, L. E., Huang, E. P. & Stevens, C. F. Very short-term plasticity in hippocampal synapses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14843-14847 (1997).
24. Harata, N. et al. Limited numbers of recycling vesicles in small CNS nerve terminals: implications for neural signaling and vesicular cycling. Trends Neurosci. 24, 637-643 (2001).
25. von Gersdorff, H., Borst, J. & Gerard, G. Short-term plasticity at the calyx of Held. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 55-64 (2002).
26. Jeffress, L. A. Mathematical and electrical models of auditory detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 187-203 (1968).
27. Tobias, J. V. & Zerlin, S. Lateralization thresholds as a function of stimulus duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31, 1591-1594 (1959).
28. Wagner, H. A temporal window for lateralization of interaural time difference by barn owls. J. Comp. Physiol. A 169, 281-289 (1991).
29. Smith, D. J. & Rubel, E. W. Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: dendritic gradients in nucleus laminaris. J. Comp. Neurol. 186, 213-239 (1979).
30. Reyes, A. D., Rubel, E. W & Spain, W. J. Membrane properties underlying the firing of neurons in the avian cochlear nucleus. J. Neurosci. 14, 5352-5364 (1994).