Role of nuclear fusion in future energy systems and the environment under future uncertainties

Energy Policy

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 775-797

  Tokimatsu, Koji ^a   Fujino, Jun'ichi ^b   Konishi, Satoshi ^c   Ogawa, Yuichi ^d   Yamaji, Kenji ^d  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE EARTH   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^c JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; ENERGY UTILIZATION; INVESTMENTS;

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY;

FUSION REACTIONS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ENERGY MARKET; FUTURE PROSPECT; NUCLEAR POWER; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0037410704     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00127-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Asaoka, Y., (2001). Maximum implementation capacity of fusion power reactors. Fusion Technology, 39(2), 518-522.
2. Aymar, R., et al., "ITER-FEAT-The Future International Burning Plasma Experiment Overview", IAEA-CN-77/ITEROV/1, in proc. of 18th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Sorrento, October 2000, 2001 Fusion Energy 2000 (Proc. 18th Int. Conf. Sorrento, 2000) (Vienna: IAEA) CD-ROM file, http://www.iaea.org/programmes/ripc/physics/fec2000/html/node1.htm.
3. 2 concentration. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1(2), 113-139.
4. Hammacher, T., 2000. Economic and environmental performance of future fusion plants in comparison, IAEA-CN-77/SEP/04. In: proceedings of the 18th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Sorrento, October.
5. Hondo, H., 2000. Evaluation of power generation technologies based on life cycle CO2 emissions, Socio-Economic Research Center, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Y99009 (In Japanese).
6. IIASA, 1998. In: Nakicenovic, N., et al. (Eds.), Global Energy Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
7. IPCC, 1995. In: Houghton, L.G., et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 1994, Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and An Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. IPCC, 2000. In: Nakicenovic, N., et al. (Eds.), Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
9. ITER, 2001. The ITER Council. Final Report of the ITER Engineering Design Activities (ITER-FR), Proposed Schedule and Estimates of Manpower and Cost, IAEA, Vienna, July.
10. Kikuchi, M., (1991). Conceptual design of the steady state tokamak reactor (SSTR). Fusion Engineering and Design, 18 195-202.
11. Kikuchi, M., (1996). An economically competitive fusion reactor. Fusion Technology, 30 1631.
12. Lako, P., 1998. The Long-term Potential of Fusion Power in Western Europe MAKAL scvenarios until 2100, ECN-C-98-071, The Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, December.
13. Masters, C.D., et al., 1994. World petroleum assessment and analysis. Proceedings of the 14th World Petroleum Congress, Stavanger, No.
14. Miller, R.L., 1997. Economic goals and requirements for competitive fusion energy. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology (ISFNT-4), Tokyo, April.
15. Morita, T. (2000). Overview of mitigation scenarios for global climate stabilization based on new IPCC SRES emission scenarios (SRES). Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 3(2), 65-88.
16. OECD/NEA-IAEA, 1995. Uranium 1995 Resources, Production and Demand 1996.
17. Okano, K., 1998. Compact reversed shear tokamak reactor with a super-heated steam cycle, IAEA-CN-69/FTP-11. In: Proceedings of the 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Yokohama, October.
18. Rogner, H. H. (1997). An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 22, 217-262.
19. SCI (Special Committee on the ITER in Japanese Atomic Energy Committee), 2000. http://www.naka.jaeri.go.jp/SCI/
20. Tokimatsu, K., (1998). Study of design parameters for minimizing the cost of electricity of tokamak fusion power reactors. Nuclear Fusion 38, 885-902.
21. Tokimatsu, K., (2000). Energy analysis and carbon dioxide emission of tokamak fusion power reactors. Fusion Engineering and Design 48, 483-498.
22. Uchiyama, Y., 1994. Life cycle assessment of power generation systems, Socio-Economic Research Center, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Y94009 (In Japanese).
23. WEO, 1998. World Energy Outlook, 1998 Edition, International Energy Agency.
24. 2 concentration at 550(hsp sp=0.16)ppm. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 3(2), 159-171.