Modelling electoral second choices: Thwarted voters in the United States, France, and Russia

Electoral Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 265-285

  Pierce, Roy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Candidate evaluations; Electoral behavior; Partisanship; Presidential elections; Primary elections; Turnout

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; ELECTORAL SYSTEM; PARTY POLITICS; POLITICAL IDEOLOGY; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

FRANCE; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037409469     PISSN: 02613794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00015-X     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alvarez, M.R., Nagler, J., 1998. When politics and models collide: estimating models of multiparty elections. American Journal of Political Science 42, 55-96.
2. Atkeson, L.R., 1998. Divisive primaries and general election outcomes: another look at presidential campaigns. American Journal of Political Science 42, 256-271.
3. Burden, B.C., Lacy, D., 1999. The vote-stealing and turnout effects of third-party candidates in U.S. presidential elections, 1968-1996. Paper delivered at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.
4. Brody, R.A., 1978. The puzzle of political participation in America. In: King, A. (Ed.), The New American Political System. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC.
5. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., Stokes, D., 1960. The American Voter. Wiley, New York.
6. Converse, P.E., Pierce, R., 1986. Political Representation in France. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Davis, O.A., Hinich, M.J., Ordeshook, P.C., 1970. An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. American Political Science Review 64, 426-448.
8. Downs, A., 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York.
9. Lacy, D., Burden, B.C., 1999. The vote-stealing and turnout effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 U.S. presidential election. American Journal of Political Science 43, 233-255.
10. Miller, W.E., 1992. The puzzle transformed: explaining declining turnout. Political Behavior 14, 1-44.
11. Miller, W.E., Shanks, J.M., 1996. The New American Voter. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
12. Pierce, R., 1995. Choosing the Chief: Presidential Elections in France and the United States. Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor.
13. Riker, W.H., Ordeshook, P.C., 1968. A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review 62, 25-42.
14. Sanders, M.S., 1998. Unified models of turnout and vote choice for two-candidate a three-candidate elections. Political Analysis 7, 89-115.
15. Sanders, M.S., 2001. Uncertainty and turnout. Political Analysis 9, 45-57.
16. Southwell, P.L., 1986. The politics of disgruntlement: non-voting and defection among supporters of nomination losers, 1968-1984. Political Behavior 8, 81-95.
17. Stone, W.J., 1986. The carryover effect in presidential elections. American Political Science Review 80, 271-279.
18. Stone, W.J., Atkeson, L.R., Rapoport, R., 1992. Turning on and turning off? Mobilization and demobilization effects of presidential nomination campaigns. American Journal of Political Science 36, 665-691.
19. Thurner, P.W., Eymann, A., 2000. Policy-specific alienation and indifference in the calculus of voting: a simultaneous model of party choice and abstention. Public Choice 102, 45-69.
20. Whiteley, P., Seyd, P., 2003. How to win a landslide by really trying: the effects of local campaigning on voting in the 1997 British general election. Electoral Studies 22, 301-324.
21. Zhang, J., Hoffman, S.D., 1993. Discrete-choice logit models: testing the IIA property. Sociological Methods and Research 22, 193-213.