Energy modeling on cleaner vehicles for reducing CO2 emissions in Japan

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 389-396

  Nakata, Toshihiko ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Carbon emissions; Energy model; Energy taxes; Fuel cell vehicles; Hybrid vehicles

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CRUDE PETROLEUM; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FUEL CELLS; GAS EMISSIONS;

CLEANER VEHICLES;

VEHICLES;

EID: 0037409293     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00061-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Oman H. Electric and hybrid vehicle performance. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine. 14:(4):1999;43-45.
2. Kitada S. Electric hybrid vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production. 5:(1-2):1997;176.
3. Gutmann G. Hybrid electric vehicles and electrochemical storage systems - a technology push-pull couple. Journal of Power Sources. 84:1999;275-279.
4. Iwai N. Analysis on fuel economy and advanced systems of hybrid vehicles. JSAE Review. 20:1999;3-11.
5. Nakata T. Analysis of the impact of hybrid vehicles on energy systems in Japan. Transportation Research Part D. 5:(5):2000;373-383.
6. Honda Motor Corporation. FCX-V1 & FCX-V2, 1999. http://www.honda.co.jp/news/1999/4990906c.html.
7. Mercedes-Benz. New electric car: Four research vehicles in just three years, 2000. http://www.mercedes.com/e/innovation/fmobil/necar.htm.
8. Panik F. Fuel cells for vehicles applications in cars - bringing the future closer. Journal of Power Sources. 71:1998;36-38.
9. Renzi S., Crawford R. Powering the next generation automobile: Daimler Chrysler's venture into fuel cell technology. Corporate Environmental Strategy. 7:2000;38-50.
10. Toyota Motor Corporation. Fuel cell electric vehicle, 2000. http://www.toyota.co.jp/eco/fcev/index.html.
11. Coup D. Toyota's approach to alternative technology vehicles: The power of diversification. Corporate Environmental Strategy. 6:1999;258-269.
12. Ballard. Ballard, Honda sign $25.9-million supply agreement for fuel cells, 2001. http://www.ballard.com/viewpressrelease.
13. Thomas C.E., James B., Lomax F. Market penetration scenarios for fuel cell vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 23:(10):1998;949-966.
14. Ogden J., Steinbugler M., Kreutz T. A comparision of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicles design and infrastructure development. Journal of Power Sources. 79:1999;143-168.
15. Thomas C.E., James B., Lamax F., Kuhn I. Fuel options for the fuel cell vehicle: hydrogen, methanol or gasoline? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 25:2000;551-567.
16. Piel W. Transportation fuels of the future? Fuel Processing Technology. 71:2001;167-179.
17. Hackney J., Neufville R.L. ife cycle model of alternative fuel vehicles; emissions, energy, and cost trade-offs. Transportation Research Part A. 35:2001;243-266.
18. Bull S. Renewable energy transportation technologies. Renewable Energy. 9:1996;1019-1024.
19. Lave L., Maclean H., Hendrickson C., Lankey R. Life-cycle analysis of alternative automobile fuel/propulsion technologies. Environmental Science and Technology. 34:(17):2000;3598-3605.
20. Wise J. New vehicle technologies and the energy system: Sea change or pond ripples. 21st USAEE/IAEE Annual North America Conference, Philadelphia, PA, 2000.
21. Edinger A, Isenberg G. Transportation after Kyoto: Alternative fuels and innovative drive systems. Proceedings of the 21st USAEE/IAEE Annual North America Conference, Philadelphia, P, 2000. p. 1-9.
22. Ogden J. Developing an infrastructure for hydrogen vehicles: a Southern California case study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 24:1999;709-730.
23. Ekdunge P., Raberg M. The fuel cell vehicle analysis of energy use, emissions and cost. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 23:(5):1998;381-385.
24. Hart D., Leach M., Fouquet R., Pearson P., Bauen A. Methanol infrastructure - will it affect the introduction of SPFC vehicles? Journal of Power Sources. 86:2000;542-547.
25. Lazarus M., Heaps C., Raskin P. LEAP Long-range energy alternatives planning system. 1997;Stockholm Environmental Institute, Boston, MA.
26. Lydick J, Morris SC, Lee J, Goldstein G. Demo MARKAL abbreviated version of the US MARKAL energy systems model, created for demonstration: abilities, limitations, and demonstration. BNL-47782, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 1990.
27. Lamont A. User's guide to the META•Net economic modeling system version 1.2. UCRL-ID-122511. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1994.
28. Edmonds J.A., Pitcher H.M., Barns D., Baron R., Wise M.A. Modeling future greenhouse gas emissions: The second generation model description. Klein L.R., Lo F. Modeling global change. 1995;295-362 United Nations University Press, New York.
29. Lee H, Oliveira-Martins J, Mensbrugghe D. The OECD Green model: An updated overviews. Technical paper No. 97, OECD, Paris, 1994.
30. Federation of Electric Power Companies. Handbook of the electric power industry. Tokyo, 1998.
31. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Assumptions for the annual energy outlook. Washington DC, 1998.
32. MITI, Agency of Natural Resources and Energy. An Interim report on general energy supply and demand. Tokyo, 1998.
33. MITI, Agency of Natural Resources and Energy. Current status and future prospect of PV program in Japan. Tokyo, 1999.
34. Energy Data and Modeling Center. EDMC handbook of energy and economic statistics in Japan. Tokyo, 2000.
35. Nagata, Y. Personal communication. June 21, 2000.
36. Sawa T. Chikyuu ondanka wo fusegu. 1997;Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo.
37. Nakata T. Analysis of the impacts of carbon taxes on energy systems in Japan. Energy Policy. 29:(2):2001;159-166.
38. Hybrid Car PRIUS. TH0015-9903. Toyota Motor Corporation. Nagoya, 1999.
39. Nakata T. A case study on energy systems in Japan: Impact of deregulation of electric power industry. Proceeding of the 21st Annual North American Conference. Philadelphia, PA, 2000. p. 1-10.