Presumed joint probability density function model for turbulent combustion

Fuel

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1091-1101

  Guo, Z M ^a   Zhang, H Q ^a   Chan, C K ^b   Lin, W Y ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Diffusion combustion; Eddy breakup Arrhenius model; Laminar flamelet model; Premixed combustion; Presumed probability density function model

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTIONS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); GAS TURBINES; HEAT TREATMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METHANE; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; VECTORS;

TURBULENT COMBUSTION;

COMBUSTION;

EID: 0037409102     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00011-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bray K.N.C. The challenge of turbulent combustion. Proc Combust Inst. 26:1996;1.
2. Spalding D.B. Mathematical models of turbulent flames: a review. Combust Sci Technol. 13:1973;3.
3. Bray K.N.C., Libby P.A. Recent developments in the BML model of premixed turbulent combustion. Libby P.A., Williams F.A. Turbulent reacting flows. 1993;Academic Press, New York.
4. Peters N. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 10:1984;319.
5. Pratt D.T. Mixing and chemical reaction in continuous combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 1:1976;73.
6. Pope S.B. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 11:1985;119.
7. Sion M., Chen J.Y. Scalar PDF modeling of turbulent nonpremixed methanol-air flames. Combust Sci Technol. 88:1992;89.
8. Zhang H.Q., Zhou L.X., Chan C.K. A double k-ε and multi-δ PDF model for turbulent gas-liquid reacting flows. Fuel. 81:2002;817.
9. x formation in gas combustion. Fuel. 79:2000;1289.
10. Graham M.G., Suresh M. A comparison of scalar PDF turbulent combustion models. Combust Flame. 113:1998;442.
11. Baurle R.A., Alexopoulos C.A., Hassan H.A. Assumed joint probability density-function approach for supersonic turbulent combustion. J Propul Power. 10:(4):1994;473.
12. Elbanhawy Y., Sibasegaram S., Whitelaw J.H. Premixed, turbulent combustion of a sudden-expansion flow. Combust Flame. 50:1983;153.
13. Westbrook C.K., Dryer F.L. Simplified reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels in flames. Combust Sci Technol. 27:1981;31.
14. Antti O., Erkki M.M. Use of PDF in modelling of nitric oxide formation in methane combustion. The Third Eur Conf Combust Technol Clean Environ, Lisbon, Portugal, 3-6 July, 1995. 18:(3):1995;16.
15. Jeng S.M., Faeth G.M. Species concentrations and turbulence properties in buoyant methane diffusion flames. J Heat Transfer. 106:(4):1984;721.
16. Rodi W. Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics-a state of the art review. 1980;IAHR, Delft.
17. Barlow R.S., Frank J.H. Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions on methane/air flames. Proc Combust Inst. 27:1998;1087.
18. Flagan R.C., Seinfeld J.H. Fundamentals of air pollution engineering. 1988;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19. Meunier P., Costa M., Carvalho M.G. The formation and destruction of NO in turbulent propane diffusion flames. Fuel. 77:1998;1705.
20. Chen C.P., Chen J.Y., Yam C.G., Marx K.D. Numerical modeling of NO formation in laminar Bunsen flames - a flamelet approach. Combust Flame. 114:1998;420.
21. Datta A., Som S.K. Combustion and emission characteristics in a gas turbine combustor at different pressure and swirl conditions. Appl Therm Engng. 19:1999;949.
22. Caldeira-Pires A., Heitor M.V., Carvalho J.A. Jr. Characteristics of nitric oxide formation rates in turbulent nonpremixed jet flames. Combust Flame. 120:2000;382.
23. x emission characteristics in rich-lean combustion of hydrogen. JSAE Rev. 23:2002;9.