Combining assessment and research during development of large technology integration projects

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 203-213

  Koszalka, Tiffany A ^a   Grabowski, Barbara L ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment and research strategies; National Aeronautics and Space Administration educational resources; Research on technology integration; Technology evaluation; Technology integration assessment

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0037407109     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00004-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Boone, W. J., & Butler Kahle, J. (1998). Student perceptions of instruction, peer interest, and adult support for middle school science: differences by race and gender. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, 333-340.
2. Charles, C. (1998). Introduction to educational research. New York: Longman.
3. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
4. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
5. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1978). The systematic design of instruction. Dallas, TX: Scott, Foresman and Company.
6. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research. New York: Longman.
7. Grabowski, B., McCarthy, M., & Koszalka, T. (1998). NASA technical publication 1998-206547. NASA technical publication 1998-206547, Hanover, MD: NASA Center for Aerospace Information. http:/www.dfrc.nasa. gov/DTRS/1998/index.
8. Hardin, J., & Ziebarth, J. (1995). Digital technology and its impact on education: The future of networking technologies for learning. Washington DC: US Department of Education.
9. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Kaufman, R., & Keller, J. (1994). Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick. Human Resources Quarterly, 5(4), 371-380.
11. Kaufman, R., Keller, J., & Watkins, R. (1995). What works and what doesn't: evaluation beyond Kirkpatrick. Performance and Instruction, 35(2), 8-12.
12. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.
13. Koszalka, T (1999). The relationship between the types of resources used in science classrooms and middle school students' interest in science careers: an exploratory analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
14. Koszalka, T. (2000a). KaAMS assessment plan. NASA KaAMS Documentation, Project Number: NCC5-432. Learning Using ERAST Aircraft for Understanding Remote Sensing, Atmospheric Sampling and Aircraft Technologies - LUAU II, University Park, PA: KaAMS Project Office.
15. Koszalka, T. (2000b). Alpha teacher assessment procedures handbook. NASA KaAMS documentation Project Number: NCC5-432. Learning Using ERAST Aircraft for Understanding Remote Sensing, Atmospheric Sampling and Aircraft Technologies - LUAU II, University Park, PA: KaAMS Project Office.
16. Koszalka, T. (2000c). Beta teacher assessment procedures handbook. NASA KaAMS documentation, Project Number: NCC5-432. Learning Using ERAST Aircraft for Understanding Remote Sensing, Atmospheric Sampling and Aircraft Technologies - LUAU II, University Park, PA: KaAMS Project Office.
17. Koszalka, T., & Cullin, M. (2001). KaAMS alpha testing summary of classroom and stakeholder data. Project Number: NCC5-432. Learning Using ERAST Aircraft for Understanding Remote Sensing, Atmospheric Sampling and Aircraft Technologies - LUAU II, University Park, PA: KaAMS Project Office.
18. Koszalka, T., & Grabowski, B (2001) Integrating assessment and research strategies for problem-based learning with kids: kids as airborne mission scientists (KaAMS). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational and Communications Technology, Atlanta, GA.
19. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-212.
20. Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19.
21. Krathwohl, D. R. (1998). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
22. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective instruction. New York: Wiley.
23. Owston, R. D. (1997). The world wide web: a technology to enhance teaching and learning?. Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27-33.
24. Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
25. Rice, J. C., McBride, R. H., & John, D. (1998). Defining a web-based learning environment, http://www/byu.edu/ipt/workshop/wbi/text.html.
26. Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.