Monte Carlo study of conservative transport in heterogeneous dual-porosity media

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 275, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 229-241

  Huang, Hai ^a,b   Hassan, Ahmed E ^a,b,c   Hu, Bill X ^a,b  

^a DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^c CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Hydraulic conductivity; Markov chain; Monte Carlo simulation method

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MONTE CARLO METHODS; POROUS MATERIALS;

CONSERVATIVE TRANSPORT;

GROUNDWATER FLOW;

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER; HETEROGENEOUS MEDIUM; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; POROUS MEDIUM; SOLUTE TRANSPORT;

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HETEROGENEOUS MEDIUM; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; POROUS MEDIUM; SOLUTE TRANSPORT;

EID: 0037406645     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00045-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Barenblatt, G.I., Zheltov, Iu.P., Kochina, I.N., 1960. Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 24, 1286-1303.
2. Bellin, A., Salandin, P., Rinaldo, A., 1992. Simulation of dispersion in heterogeneous porous formations: statistics first-order theories, convergence of computations. Water Resour. Res. 28 (9), 2211-2227.
3. Bibby, R., 1981. Mass transport of solutes in dual-porosity media. Water Resour. Res. 17, 1075-1081.
4. Chen, W., Wagnet, R.J., 1995. Solute transport in porous media with sorption site heterogeneity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 2725-2734.
5. Clifton, P.M., Neuman, S.P., 1982. Effect of kriging and inverse modeling on conditional simulation of the Avra Valley aquifer in Southern Arizona. Water Resour. Res. 18 (4), 1215-1234.
6. Coats, K.H., Smith, B.D., 1964. Dead-end pore volume and dispersion in porous media. SPE J. 4, 73-84.
7. Cushman, J.H., 1997. The Physics of Fluids in Hierarchical Porous Media: Angstroms to Miles, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
8. Dagan, G., 1989. Flow and Transport in Porous Formations, Springer, Berlin.
9. Deng, F.-W., Cushman, J.H., Delleur, J.W., 1993. A fast Fourier transform stochastic analysis of the contaminant transport problem. Water Resour. Res. 29 (9), 3241-3247.
10. Duguid, J.O., Lee, P.C.Y., 1977. Flow in fractured porous media. Water Resour. Res. 13, 558-566.
11. Freeze, R.A., 1975. A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneously media. Water Resour. Res. 11 (5), 725-741.
12. Gelhar, L.W., 1993. Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. van Genuchten, M.T., Wierenga, P.J., 1976. Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40, 473-480.
14. 1990. Transport of water and solutes in macropores. Geoderma 46 (1-3), 1-297.
15. Gerke, H.H., van Genuchten, M.Th., 1993a. A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resour. Res. 29, 305-319.
16. Gerke, H.H., van Genuchten, M.Th., 1993b. Evaluation of a first-order water transfer term for variably saturated dual-porosity models. Water Resour. Res. 29, 1225-1238.
17. Gish, T.J., Shirmohammadi, A. (Eds.), 1991. Preferential flow, Proceedings of the National Symposium, December, 1991, Chicago, Illinois, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, p. 408.
18. Gutjahr, A.L., 1989. Fast Fourier transforms for random field generations. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Report, No. 196, Socorro, NM.
19. Haggerty, R., Gorelick, S.M., 1995. Multi-rate mass transfer for modeling diffusion and surface reaction in media with pore scale heterogeneity. Water Resour. Res. 31 (10), 2383-2400.
20. Haggerty, R., Gorelick, S.M., 1998. Modeling mass transfer process in soil columns with pore scale heterogeneity. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62 (1), 62-74.
21. Harvey, C.F., Gorelick, S.M., 1995. Temporal moment-generating equations: modeling transport and mass transfer in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 31 (8), 1895-1911.
22. Hassan, A.E., Cushman, J.H., Delleur, J.W., 1997. Monte Carlo Studies of Flow and Transport in Fractal Conductivity Fields: Comparison With Stochastic Perturbation Theory 33 (11), 2519-2534.
23. Hassan, A.E., Cushman, J.H., Delleur, J.W., 1998. A Monte Carlo assessment of Eulerian flow and transport perturbation models. Water Resour. Res. 34 (5), 1143-1163.
24. 4) solutions for the flow problem in an infinite domain. Water Resour. 35, 3685-3697.
25. Hu, B.X., Huang, H., Hassan, A.E., Cushman, J.H., 2002. Stochastic reactive transport in porous media: Higher order closures. Adv. Water Resour. 25 (5), 513-531.
26. Huang, H., Hu, B.X., 2000. Nonlocal nonreactive transport in heterogeneous porous media with interregional mass diffusion. Water Resour. Res. 36 (7), 1665-1675.
27. Huang, H., Hu, B.X., 2001. Nonlocal reactive transport in heterogeneous porous media with rate-limited sorption and intra-regional mass diffusion. Water Resour. Res. 37, 639-647.
28. Li, Z., Brusseau, M.L., 2000. Transport of reactive solutes in heterogeneous porous media: microscopic and macroscopic approaches for incorporating heterogeneous rate-limited mass transfer. Water Resour. Res. 36 (1), 2853-2867.
29. Moench, A.F., 1984. Double-porosity models for a fissured groundwater reservoir with fracture skin. Water Resour. Res. 20, 831-846.
30. Painter, S., Cvetkovic, V., Turner, D.R., 2001. Effect of heterogeneity on radionuclide retardation in the alluvial aquifer near Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Groundwater 39 (3), 326-338.
31. Parzen, E., 1962. Stochastic Processes, Holden-Day, Merrifield, VA.
32. Pedit, J.A., Miller, C.T., 1994. Heterogeneous sorption process in subsurface systems. 1. Model formulations and applications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 2094-2104.
33. Pedit, J.A., Miller, C.T., 1995. Heterogeneous sorption process in subsurface systems. 2. Diffusion modeling approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 1766-1772.
34. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Computing, Cambridge University Press, New York.
35. Rubin, Y., 1990. Stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 26 (10), 2631.
36. Smith, L., Freeze, R.A., 1979. Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 2. two-dimensional simulation. Water Resour. Res. 15 (6), 1543-1559.
37. Smith, L., Schwartz, F.W., 1980. Mass transport, 1. a stochastic analysis of macrodispersion. Water Resour. Res. 16 (2), 303-313.
38. Smith, L., Schwartz, F.W., 1981. Mass transport, 2. analysis of uncertainty in prediction. Water Resour. Res. 17 (2), 351-369.
39. Tompson, A.F.B., 1993. Numerical simulation of chemical migration in physically and chemically heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 29 (11), 3709-3726.
40. Tompson, A.F.B., Gelhar, L.W., 1990. Numerical simulation of solute transport in three-dimensional, randomly heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 26 (10), 2541-2562.
41. Tompson, A.F.B., Ababou, R., Gelhar, L.W., 1989. Implementation of the three dimensional turning bands field generator. Water Resour. Res. 25 (10), 2227-2243.
42. Valocchi, A.J., Quinodoz, A.M., 1989. Application of the random walk method to simulate the transport of kinetically adsorbing solute. In: Abriola, L.M., (Ed.), Groundwater Contamination, 185. IAHS Publication, Wallingford, pp. 35-42.
43. Villermaux, J., 1981. Theory of linear chromatography. NATO ASI Ser. E 33, 83-140.
44. Warren, J.E., Root, P.J., 1963. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 3, 245-255.