Separating arterial and venous components from 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies using factor analysis

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 928-933

  Martel, Anne L ^a,c   Fraser, Doug ^b   Delay, G Steve ^b   Morgan, Paul S ^b   Moody, Alan R ^b  

^a QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced; Factor analysis; MR venography; MRA

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; SEPARATION; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; EIGENIMAGE FILTERING; MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION; MR VENOGRAPHY; SUBTRACTION METHOD; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

ARTERY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DOUBLE SUBTRACTION METHOD; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SINGLE SUBTRACTION METHOD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VEIN; VENOUS CIRCULATION;

EID: 0037406526     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10462     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bock M, Schoenberg SO, Floemer F, Schad LR. Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:481-487.
2. Kaandorp DW, Kopinga K, Wijn PF. Venous signal suppression in 3D dynamic Gd-enhanced carotid artery imaging using the eigenimage filter. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:307-313.
3. Lebowitz JA, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Gadolinium-enhanced body MR venography with subtraction technique. Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:755-758.
4. Fraser DG, Moody AR, Davidson I, Morgan PS, Martel AL. Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) using venous enhanced subtracted peak arterial (VESPA) magnetic resonance venography compared to conventional venography. Radiology 2002;226:812-820.
5. Mazaheri Y, Carroll TJ, Du J, Block WF, Fain SB, Hany TF, Aagaard BD, Strother CM, Mistretta CA, Grist TM. Combined time-resolved and high-spatial-resolution 3D MRA using an extended adaptive acquisition. J Magn Reson Imag 2002;15:291-301.
6. Lei T, Udupa JK, Saha PK, Odhner D. Artery-vein separation via MRA-An image processing approach. Med Imag IEEE Trans 2001;20: 689-703.
7. Tizon X, Smedby O. Segmentation with gray-scale connectedness can separate arteries and veins in MRA. J Magn Reson Imag 2002;15:438-445.
8. Martel AL, Barber DC. A new approach to dynamic study analysis. Prog Clin Biol Res 1991;363:327-340.
9. Samal M, Karny M, Zahalka D. Confirmatory aspects in factor-analysis of image sequences. Lect Notes Cornput Sci 1991;511:397-407.
10. Martel AL, Moody AR, Allder SJ, Delay GS, Morgan PS. Extracting parametric images from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies of the brain using factor analysis. Med Image Anal 2001;5:29-39.
11. Fraser DG, Moody AR, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Davidson I. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136:89-98.
12. Windham JP, Abd-Allah MA, Reimann DA, Froelich JW, Haggar AM. Eigenimage filtering in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12: 1-9.
13. Frouge C, Guinebretiere JM, Contesso G, Di Paola R, Blery M. Correlation between contrast enhancement in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast and tumor angiogenesis. Invest Radiol 1994;29: 1043-1049.
14. Du J, Mazaheri Y, Carroll TJ, Esparaza-Coss E, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Automated region-specific VTRAC segmentation in peripheral MRA. In: Proc 8th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Denver, 2000. p 1807.
15. Hoffmann U, Loewe C, Bernhard C, Weber M, Cejna M, Herold CJ, Schima W. MRA of the lower extremities in patients with pulmonary embolism using a blood pool contrast agent: initial experience. J Magn Reson Imag 2002;15:429-437.