Willingness to use instant home HIV tests: Data from the California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 340-348

  Phillips, Kathryn A ^a   Chen, James L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIFORNIA BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SURVEY; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CONTROL; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; LABORATORY TEST; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATION; PROPHYLAXIS; RATING SCALE; RISK FACTOR; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0037405363     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00019-9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Prevalence of risk behaviors for HIV infection among adults - United States, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 50:2001;262-265.
2. Sweeney P, Fleming P, Ward J, Karon J. A minimum estimate of HIV infected persons who have been tested in the US. Paper presented at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Toronto, 1997.
3. Bozzette S., Berry S., Duan N., et al. The care of HIV-infected adults in the United States. HIV costs and services utilization study consortium. N Engl J Med. 339:1998;1897-1904.
4. Janssen R., Holtgrave D., Valdiserri R., Shepherd M., Gayle H., De Cock K. The serostatus approach to fighting the HIV epidemic prevention strategies for infected individuals . Am J Public Health. 91:2001;1019-1024.
5. Myolankis E., Paliou M., Lally M., Flanigan T., Rich J. Laboratory testing for infection with the human immunodeficiency virus established and novel approaches . Am J Med. 109:2000;568-576.
6. Respess R., Rayfield M., Dondero T. Laboratory testing and rapid HIV assays applications for HIV surveillance in hard-to-reach populations . AIDS. 15:(suppl 3):2001;49-59.
7. Kassler W. Advances in HIV testing technology and their potential impact on prevention. AIDS Educ Prev. 9:(suppl B):1997;27-40.
8. Spielberg F., Kassler W. Rapid testing for HIV antibody a technology whose time has come . Ann Intern Med. 125:1996;509-511.
9. Summers T., Spielberg F., Collins C., Coates T. Voluntary counseling, test and referral for HIV new technologies, research findings create dynamic opportunities . J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 25:(suppl 2):2000;128-135.
10. Spielberg F., Critchlow C., Vittinghoff E., et al. Slow diffusion of home HIV-speical collection Provider concerns at odds with client preferences. The HIV Early Detection Study Group . Sex Transm Dis. 28:2001;51-57.
11. Spielberg F., Kurth A., Gorbach P., Goldbaum G. Moving from apprehension to action HIV counseling and testing preferences in three at-risk populations . AIDS Educ Prev. 13:2001;524-540.
12. Spielberg F., Critchlow C., Vittinghoff E., et al. Home collection for frequent HIV testing acceptability of oral fluids, dried blood spots and telephone results. HIV Early Detection Study Group . AIDS. 14:2000;1819-1828.
13. Phillips K.A., Flatt S.J., Morrison K.R., Coates T.J. Potential use of home HIV testing. N Engl J Med. 332:1995;1308-1310.
14. Branson B. Home sample collection tests for HIV infection. JAMA. 280:1998;1699-1701.
15. Phillips K.A., Morin S., Coates T., Fernyak S., Marsh A., Ramos-Irizarry L. Home sample collection for HIV testing. JAMA. 283:2000;198-199. (letter).
16. HIV counseling and testing in publicly funded sites 1996 annual report . 1998;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA. May.
17. Orasure Technologies, Inc. Products, infectious disease, OraSure HIV-1 Available at: www.orasure.com/news. Accessed on January 13, 2003.
18. Merson M.H., Feldman E.A., Bayer R., Stryker J. Rapid self testing for HIV infection. Lancet. 349:1997;352-353.
19. AIDS Alert. CDC launching new era in testing by giving OK to rapid screening tests. American Health Consultants, March 1, 1998.
20. Skolnik H., Phillips K., Binson D., Dilley J. Deciding where and how to be tested for HIV What matters most? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 27:2001;292-300.
21. Phillips KA, Maddala T, Johnson FR. The use of conjoint analysis to measure preferences for HIV testing. Health Ser Res 2002;37:1659-79.
22. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census 2000 data for the state of California. Available at: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html. Accessed on March 12, 2003.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001 National Health Interview Survey, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at:www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. Accessed on May 6, 2002.
24. Hosmer D., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 1989;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
25. HIV testing among racial/ethnic minorities, United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 50:2001;1054-1058.
26. Anand G. Why rapid HIV tests, widely sold overseas, have eluded the U.S. Wall Street Journal, 2001:1-3.
27. Phillips K.A., Morrison K.R., Sonnad S.S., Bleecker T. HIV counseling and testing of pregnant women and women of childbearing age by primary care providers self-reported beliefs and practices . J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 14:1997;174-178.
28. Phillips KA, Maddala T, Johnson FR. Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing. Health Ser Res 2002;37:1681-705.