Repeatability of wire and surface electrodes in gait

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 338-344

  Bogey, Ross ^a   Cerny, Kay ^b   Mohammed, Olfat ^b  

^a KESSLER FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electromyography; Gait; Intramuscular Electrode; Reliability; Surface Electrode

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; MUSCLE; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; TRANSDUCERS;

SURFACE ELECTRODES;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTRODE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAMUSCULAR ELECTRODE; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FORCE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOLEUS MUSCLE; SURFACE ELECTRODE;

EID: 0037404604     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000064717.90796.7A     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gregor R, Komi P, Browning R, et al: A comparison of the triceps surae and residual moments at the ankle during cycling. J Biomech 1991;24:287-97
2. Komi P, Fukashiro S, Jarvinen M: Biomechanical loading of Achilles tendon during normal locomotion. Clin Sports Med 1992;11:521-31
3. Fukashiro S, Komi P, Jarvinen M, et al: In vivo Achilles tendon loading during jumping in humans. Acta Physiol 1995;71:453-8
4. Mann RA, Moran GT, Dougherty SA: Comparative electromyography of the lower extremity in jogging, running, and sprinting. Am J Sports Med 1986;14:501-10
5. Mann RA, Inman VT: Phasic activity of intrinsic muscles of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1964;46:469-81
6. Sutherland D: An electromyographic study of plantar flexors of the ankle in normal walking on the level. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1966;48:66-71
7. Solomonow M, Baratta R, Bernardi M, et al: Surface and wire EMG crosstalk in neighboring muscles. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1994;4:131-42
8. Perry J, Easterday C, Antonelli D: Surface versus intramuscular electrodes for electromyography of superficial and deep muscles. Phys Ther 1981;61:7-15
9. Bogey R, Perry J, Bontrager E, et al: Comparison of across-subject gait EMG profiles using surface and multiple wire electrodes. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000;10:255-9
10. Giroux B, Lamontagne M: Comparisons between surface electrodes and intramuscular wire electrodes in isometric and dynamic conditions. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990;30:397-405
11. Jacobson W, Gabel R, Brand R: Surface versus fine-wire electrode ensemble-averaged signals during gait. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1995;5:37-44
12. Kadaba M, Wooten M, Gainey J, et al: Repeatability of phasic muscle activity: Performance of surface and intramuscular wire electrodes in gait analysis. J Orthop Res 1985;3:350-9
13. Komi P, Buskirk E: Reproducibility of electromyographic measurements with inserted wire electrodes and surface electrodes. Electromyography 1970;4:357-67
14. Perry, J: Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1992
15. Viitasalo J, Komi P: Signal characteristics of EMG with special reference to reproducibility of measurements. Acta Physiol Scand 1975;93:531-9
16. Kadaba M, Ramakrishnan H, Wooten M, et al: Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Res 1989;7:849-60
17. Basmajian J, Stedio G: A new bipolar indwelling electrode for electromyography. J Appl Physiol 1962;17:849-58
18. Hoffer M, Perry J: Pathodynamics of gait alterations in cerebral palsy and the significance of kinetic electromyography in evaluating foot and ankle problems. Foot Ankle 1983;4:128-34
19. Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, et al: Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: A pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990;27:369-84
20. Perry J, Ireland M, Gronley J, et al: Predictive value of manual muscle testing and gait analysis in normal ankles by electromyography. Foot Ankle 1986;6:254-9
21. Bogey R, Barnes L, Perry J: A computer algorithm for determining the group electromyographic profile from individual gait EMG profiles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:286-91
22. Bogey R, Barnes L, Perry J: Computer algorithms to characterize individual subject EMG profiles during gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:835-41
23. Arsenault AB, Winter DA, Marteniuk RG, et al: How many strides are required for the analysis of electromyographic data in gait? Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18:133-5
24. Beasley W: Quantitative muscle testing: Principals and application to research and clinical services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1961;42:398-406
25. Hershler C, Milner M: An optimality criterion for processing electromyographic (EMG) signals relating to human locomotion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1978;25:413-20
26. Kirk RE: Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1968
27. Winter DA: Pathological gait analysis with computer-averaged electromyographic profiles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:393-8
28. Goodfellow J, Hungerford DS, Woods C: Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology: 2. Chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1976;58:291-9
29. Perry J, Bekey G: EMG-force relationships in skeletal muscle. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1981;7:1-22
30. Dumitru D: Electrodiagnostic Medicine, ed 1. Philadelphia, Hanley and Belfus, 1995
31. Engel W: Focal myopathic changes produced by electromyographic and hypodermic needles. "Needle myopathy." Arch Neurol 1967;16:509-11
32. Bodine-Fowler S, Garfinkel A, Roy R: Spatial distribution of muscle fibers within the territory of a motor unit. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:1133-45
33. Inman V, Ralston H, Todd F: Human Walking. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1981
34. Falconer K, Winters D: Quantitative assessment of co-contraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;25:135-49
35. Jonsson B, Komi P: Reproducibility problems when using wire electrodes in electromyographic kinesiology, in Desmedt J (ed): New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Basel, S. Karger AG, 1973, vol 1, pp 540-6
36. Brand R, Crowninshield R: Comment on criteria for patient evaluation tools. J Biomech 1981;14:655