Sensor integration in industrial environment: From fieldbus to web sensors

Computer Standards and Interfaces

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 183-194

  Flammini, Alessandra ^a   Ferrari, Paolo ^a   Sisinni, Emiliano ^a   Marioli, Daniele ^a   Taroni, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ethernet; Fieldbus; Internet; Sensors; Web sensor

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SENSORS; WEB BROWSERS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

WEB SENSORS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 0037402278     PISSN: 09205489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5489(02)00071-5     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Smith G., Bowen M. Consideration for the utilization of smart sensors. Sens. Actuators, A, Phys. 46-47:1995;521-524.
2. International Standard Organization, Road Vehicles - Interchange of Digital Information-Controller Area Network for High Speed Communication Draft Amendment, ISO 11898:1993/DAM 1, 1994.
3. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, General Purpose Field Communication System: Vol. 2. Profibus, EN50170 r 2, Dec. 1996.
4. Vitturi S. On the use of Ethernet at low level of factory communication systems. Comput. Stand. Interfaces. 23:2001;267-277.
5. Szabo C. An Ethernet compatible protocol to support real time traffic and multimedia applications. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 29:1997;335-342.
6. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE standard for a smart transducer interface for sensors and actuators - Network Capable Application Processor (NCAP) information model, IEEE Std. 1451.1 - 1999, 1999.
7. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE standard for a smart transducer interface for sensors and actuators - transducer to microprocessor communication protocols and Transducer Electronic Data Sheet (TEDS) formats, IEEE Std. 1451.2 - 1997, 1997.
8. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE 802-3: Part 3. 2000 standard, Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) and Physical Layer Specifications, 2000.
9. Licht T.R. The IEEE 1451.4 proposed standard. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 4:2001;12-18.
10. Postel J. Transmission Control Protocol RFC 793. 1981;Network Working Group, Marina del Rey, CA.
11. Park J., Yoon Y. An extended TCP/IP protocol for real-time local area networks. Control Eng. Pract. 6:1998;111-118.
12. Agranat I.D. Engineering Web technologies for embedded applications. IEEE Internet Comput. 2:1998;40-45.
13. Postel J. Internet Protocol RFC 791. 1981;Network Working Group, Marina del Rey, CA.
14. Plummer D. Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol: or converting network protocol addresses to 48bit Ethernet address for transmission on Ethernet hardware, RFC 826. 1982;Network Working Group, Boston, MA.
15. Postel J. Internet Control Message Protocol, RFC 792. 1981;Network Working Group, Marina del Rey, CA.
16. Postel J. User Datagram Protocol RFC 768. 1980;Network Working Group, Marina del Rey, CA.
17. Simpson W. The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) for the Transmission of Multi-protocol Datagrams over Point-to-Point Links, RFC 1331. 1992;Network Working Group, East Lansing, MI.
18. Cena G., Demartini C., Valenzano A. IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, On the Performances of Two Popular Fieldbuses, Proceedings, Oct. 1-3. 1997;177-186.
19. Cena G., Durante L., Valenzano A. Standard field bus networks for industrial application. Comput. Stand. Interfaces. 17:1995;155-167.
20. Fielding R., Gettys J., Mogul J., Frystyk H., Masinter L., Leach P., Berners-Lee T. Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 1.1 RFC 2616. 1999;The Internet Society, 4, rue des Falaises CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
21. Connolly D., Masinter L. The 'text/html' Media Type, RFC 2854. 2000;Network Working Group, Boston, MA.
22. Bentham J. TCP/IP Lean. 2000;CMP Books, Lawrence, KS