The analysis of UK crop allocation at the farm level: Implications for supply response analysis

Agricultural Systems

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 697-713

  Vavra, Pavel ^a   Colman, David ^b  

^a OECD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Area allocation; CAP; Corner solutions; Eligible crops; Supply response

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; CROP PRODUCTION; PROFITABILITY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0037400721     PISSN: 0308521X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00075-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adelaja, A.O., 1991. Price changes, supply elasticities, industry organization, and dairy output distribution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (1), 89-102.
2. Amemiya, T., 1998. Tobit models - a survey. Journal of Econometrics 24 (1-2), 3-61.
3. Askari, H., Cummings, J.T., 1976. Agricultural Supply Response: A Survey of the Econometric Evidence. Praeger Publishers, New York.
4. BarShira, Z., Just, R.E., Zilberman, D., 1997. Estimation of farmers' risk attitude: an econometric approach. Agricultural Economics 17 (2-3), 211-222.
5. Behrman, J.R., 1989. Agricultural supply. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (Eds.) The New Palgrave: Economic Development. Macmillan. 35-42.
6. Blarel, B., Hazell, P., Place, F., Quiggin, J., 1992. The economics of farm fragmentation - evidence from Ghana and Rwanda. World Bank Economic Review 6 (2), 233-254.
7. Boussard, J.M., 1985. Is agriculture production responsive to prices? European Review of Agricultural Economics 12, 31-47.
8. Buckwell, A., Chairman of an expert group, 1997. Towards a common agricultural and rural policy for Europe. Report convened by Commission of European Communities, Directorate General VI/A1, European Commission.
9. Chavas, J.P., Holt, M.T., 1990. Acreage decisions under risk: the case of corn and soybeans. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 529-538.
10. Colman, D., 1983. A review of the arts of supply response analysis. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 51 (3), 201-226.
11. Fraser, I., Cordina, D., 1999. An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia. Agricultural Systems 59 (3), 267-282.
12. Greene, W.H., 1993. Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed. Macmillian Publishing Company, New York.
13. Heltberg, R., 1998. Rural market imperfections and the farm size-productivity relationship. Evidence from Pakistan. World Development 26 (10), 1807-1826.
14. Henneberry, S.R., Tweeten, L., Nainggolan, K., 1991. An analysis of US aggregate output response by farm size. Agricultural Economics 5, 1-19.
15. Heshmati, A., 1994. Estimating random effects production function models with selectivity bias - an application to Swedish crop producers. Agricultural Economics 11 (2-3), 171-189.
16. Hoffman, L., Ash, M., Tung, F.L., Dyck, J., 1995. A comparison of structural change in Canadian and US grain farming. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economie Rurale 145-163.
17. Just, R.E., 1974. An investigation of the importance of risk in farmers' decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56 (1), 14-25.
18. Just, R.E., 1993. Discovering production and supply relationships: present status and future opportunities. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 61 (1), 11-40.
19. Maddala, G., 1984. Disequilibrium, self-selection, and switchning models. In: Griliches, Z., Intriligator, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics. North Holland, Amsterdam.
20. Mahe, L.P., Ortalo-Magne, F., 1999. Five proposals for a European model of the countryside. Economic Policy 28, 89-131.
21. Nerlove, M., 1979. The dynamics of agricultural supply: retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61, 874-888.
22. Nguyen, T., Cheng, E.J., Findlay, C., 1996. Land fragmentation and farm productivity in China in the 1990s. China Economic Review 7 (2), 169-180.
23. Nkonya, E., Schroeder, T., Norman, D., 1997. Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seed and fertiliser in northern Tanzania. Journal of Agricultural Economics 48 (1), 1-12.
24. Rao, J.M., 1989. Agricultural supply response: a survey. Agricultural Economics 3 (1), 1-22.
25. Smale, M., Heisey, P.W., 1993. Simultaneous estimation of seed-fertilizer adoption decision - an applicaiton to hybrid maize in Malawi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 43, 353-368.
26. Sparkes, D.L., Jaggard, K.W., Ramsden, S.J., Scott, R.K., 1998. The effect of field margins on the yield of sugar beet and cereal crops. Annals of Applied Biology 132 (1), 129-142.
27. Vella, F., 1998. Estimating models with sample selection bias: a survey. Journal of Human Resources 33 (1), 127-172.
28. von Massow, M., Weersink, A., 1993. Acreage response to government stabilization programs in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economie Rurale 41 (1), 13-26.
29. Weaver, R.D., Lass, D.A., 1989. Corner solutions in duality models - a cross-section analysis of dairy production decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (4), 1025-1040.